Let me take a step back for a second.
I was not around when the standard gas list was created, and I'm not cave-certified, but I will speculate freely anyway (grin).
@PfcAJ or
@JohnnyC can chime in to correct me if I'm off-base here.
Deco theory was no so far advanced when that list of standard gases was originally made. One reason to have standard gases is to reduce the number of variables. If everyone is using the same gases, the deco plans and algorithms can be changed when necessary and everyone benefits in a broader sweep when variability is more limited. There are fewer edge cases to worry about. When I took trimix classes, my instructor pointed out that WKPP probably used more He more often than anyone else, and he saw some logic in using the same mixes to take advantage of that large body of experience. Some years later, and lots of He bubbles later, I agree that he was absolutely right at the time, and much of that "rightness" persists even though we have learned a lot more.
The other thing to consider is that GUE stresses a team diving approach with its roots in cave diving. Everyone is rigged the same. Everyone uses the same procedures. Everyone uses the same cylinder markings. And, everyone breathes the same gases. There are at least two big advantages to the standard gas approach when diving as part of a team. One is that anyone can donate gas at any time, to anyone, and no deco recalculations are needed. This reduces the stress and complexity of gas donation scenarios. The second is that everyone knows the minimum and maximum operating depths for everyone else's gases, because they're the same across the board. So when double-checking gas switches (part of the protocol), nobody needs to think about the MODs. Likewise, everyone has the same deco schedule, so the whole team can act like a school of fish without leaders and laggards.
I think the second part stands, still, as a good idea in that kind of diving.
Further, if you are a GUE-trained diver (I am not), the urge to dive the same way, all the time, regardless of recreational or technical settings (which I share) is likely a strong one. Why change all those procedures that work? No particular reason in favor, and some against.
To me, none of this should necessarily guide a firm choice between "best*" mixes or standard gases for a non-GUE diver on a recreational dive. They're chalk and cheese in that context anyway, and the meaningful differences are negligible most of the time in my view.
* The very definition of "best mix" has changed since my original nitrox cert.
(Edited to fix typo.)