I did mention this post to Lynne today before our dive. Her response was "I EARNED that title, why would I mind anyone calling me that
Now, seriously, what did you expect? She chose to have that borg queen avatar that creeped me out to no end for years
It's a Borg cupcake now. Who can object to a cupcake? I am now the kindler, gentler, relentless advocate for standardized team diving
I don't really understand why everybody got up in arms about Dan's original post. There are a lot of ways to deal with a problem, and one of them is to avoid it in the first place. He made the point that boats are different, and it's often not too difficult to find out which boats are likely to be used by instructors with beginners, and which are going to make the trips to more difficult or advanced sites. I know we know that for some of the places we dive. If you are planning a day of diving, it's best to put yourself on a boat where you will be among similar divers with similar goals.
It's not always possible. Clearly, in this case, the diver either did not have or did not know of other options, so he went out on a boat where he was going to have to deal with a group of undifferentiated divers. Yet he did not come here complaining about OW students silting out dive sites, or beginners cutting the dive short with their rapid gas consumption. He came complaining of poor line running on the part of an instructor running a class (or mentoring, I can't remember which he was doing).
A lot of people are exercised about his comment that he thought about cutting the line. I don't know how seriously he entertained that thought, and it is not a defensible action. But I actually read his original comment as the sort of emotional reaction I might have . . . "It would serve him right if I cut that line!" with no intention of actually DOING it.
Maybe I empathize with the OP because of the number of times I've said something about somebody and discovered they were standing behind me. For a while, that seemed to be one of my favorite faux pas. Once you realize you have done that, there generally aren't any really good options. Rarely was the delivery of the opinion phrased in any way to make it palatable to the person it concerned, and often, a quick apology and exit is the best strategy.
As was beautifully described in an earlier post, we are not rational creatures most of the time. Once we are angry or defensive or threatened, we aren't receptive to information, and part of the job of an instructor is to avoid eliciting that reaction in a student. But the accepted hierarchy between teacher and student can get you through some of it; there was no assumed hierarchy here, so the instructor who found himself being criticized on a boat, in front of his student and the other divers, was almost certainly not going to be receptive to any further information from the offending source.