I still don't understand the argument of renourishment from the condo owners' standpoint. In Boca Raton, we have a handful of towering condos built near the beach, and they are usually the main proponents -for- rebuilding the beach, stating it provides huricane protection from erosion, etc. Chalfonte, Sabal Shores, Sabal Ridge, Presidential Place ... most of the biggest of the big condos on A-1-A just south of Palmetto Park Rd.
What I don't understand is that the beaches behind their condos is wider now than when they were originally built in the 70s. I remember in 1973-75, snorkeling a reef just feet from the surf high marker line. We'd park at the pavillion, and walk south maybe 1/4 mile. Before the condos, we could park -on- A-1-A and just walk across the empty lot. Nice small ledges on the outer edge of the reef. At low tide, the shallow part was exposed, much like it is at Red Reef Park.
I recall about 2-3 yrs ago the beach "erosion" made front page news on the Sun Sentinel with the rocks exposed at that same reef location, and I did write a letter to the editors explaining that was perfectly normal back in the 70s. It even peaked my interest that the old reef might be exposed again. I grabbed my snorkle gear one day and ventured out, but found what was 10-12 ft deep back in the 70s was only 4-5 ft deep from all the renourished sand washing just offshore.
I wish I could find photos of that stretch of beach back before the condos.
I wonder if there are any architectural plans for the proposed condominiums prior to being built, and any studies of future erosion.