BC materials

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

KatherineLee

Guest
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
# of dives
200 - 499
Is there a big difference between a 1600 denier nylon/cordura vs 440 in BCs? And than the double bladder wings for ultimate toughness. Is it really necessary for recreational diving/a peace of mind or just marketing when making a purchase decision? Thanks.
 
Double bladder wings are not tougher. Just bigger and more expensive which does not always mean better. Most bc's are more than rugged enough for recreational diving with a little care and thought. If you start going into caves, wrecks, etc then I would say material can be a deciding factor but then again I personally would not take a recreational bc into either. Stuff like coral and rocks can be hard on a bc but you should not be hitting that stuff anyway! What specifically are you looking at in terms of a bc. Your mention of wings would indicate a BPW. If so just about every one out there is made to last. I personally prefer Deep Sea Supply and have two of them. But HOG, Oxycheq, Golem Gear, Dive Rite, and if you have lots o money Halcyon all make great products. OMS has been around a long time but they have a rep for poor service and their bungeed wings are a whole nother discussion.
 
There probably is a difference in tensile strength and abrasion resistance when comparing the two materials (1600 vs. 440 Denier nylon). Will this translate into a "tougher" BCD? I don't know. I'm sure that a BCD made from either material will last a very long time, so long as the item is properly maintained and stored.

Double bladder wings are designed to serve as a redundant buoyancy control system. It is thought that if one bladder is punctured, the other bladder can then be used. Unfortunately, most bladders are punctured due to pinch-flats and it's possible that both bladders could be punctured by the same event. Arguably, a better way to set up a redundant buoyancy system is to dive with both a BCD and a drysuit. You'll have to decide for yourself which configuration makes more sense. IMHO, I think a single 22mm thick bladder is more than sufficient for a BCD bladder. If this is covered by an abrasion-resistant cordura-like material, that should be good enough. For standard open water recreational diving I don't think double bladder wings are necessary. In fact, some might argue that they are never a wise choice.

Hope this info helps...
 
well, the heavier fabric/cordura will wear better, but will add weight to the BC, which can be a factor with airline weight restrictions. Are you 'rough' on your gear (dive a lot, throw gear in back of truck, shore dive, drag/scrape gear) ? Do you want a longer lasting BC or can you afford to swap them out without $ really being an issue? Are you petite such that having the lightest gear that you have to handle is important to you ?
 

Back
Top Bottom