Hmmm. Well I'm sure that I'm plenty unbalanced; but the below is how I remember it, eventhough I might not be able to use my first language to write it proper...
Balanced vs Unbalanced Regs: Does it Make a Difference? | Scuba Diving
"
Balanced First Stage
Its all about the springs when discussing the difference between balanced and unbalanced first stages. With both piston and diaphragm regs, theres a high-pressure valve and seat assembly and a spring. An unbalanced reg basically has a different pressure on each end of this valve-spring assembly that causes varying effort to overcome the force of the spring as conditions change such as change in depth or tank pressure. This translates as variations in the medium pressure traveling through the hose to the second stage, resulting in harder breathing effort at depth or low tank pressure. A balanced first stage routes medium pressure air to both sides of the valve-spring assembly, so that the effort to move the spring is consistent and unaffected by variations in external conditions, giving the diver unvarying pressure to the second stage and consistent breathing effort."
Wow, that is such a mixture of some incorrect statement, with some correct statements, that it is hard to follow.
A balanced valve by definition is one that is not affected by the pressure that it is controlling.
In the Scuba world, this applies to the first stage (the tank pressure does not affect the first stage operation, and therefore the IP is constant) and to a balanced second stage (if the IP changes it does not affect the suction effort).
In reality the second stages are not 100% balanced, they are by designed meant free flow if the IP raises due to a first stage leak.
Also many first stages are not 100% balanced or should I say, many are not perfectly balanced.
All first stages used in open circuit Scuba are by designed ambient pressure compensation.
Unbalanced first stages are affected by tank pressure, but they do have pressure compensation. The only modern unbalanced first stages still in production are piston first stages.
All unbalanced pistons will have a lower IP with lower tank pressure. The high tank pressure pushes the piston to open and requires higher IP to close it.
What makes it a bit confusing is that unbalanced first stages are designed with a smaller volcano orifice (the orifice where the piston seat seals). The smaller orifice reduces the effect of tank pressure on the IP. But, the side effect is that the smaller orifice also restricts gas flow, which can be notice on very deep dives (deeper than most recreational depths).
Note about pressure compensation:
A friend of mine was diving a Sherwood with the dry bleed, but it had a malfunction, a clogged dry bleed. This malfunction defeated the pressure compensation. She could notice a difference in performance starting a 30 feet deep. By about 60 feet she could not handle the poor performance.
---------- Post added April 28th, 2014 at 07:46 PM ----------
Try this explanation:
Balanced vs Unbalanced Scuba Diving Regulators - Reg Basics for Beginners Then we can probably discuss it more if you would like.
I suspect Floyd is a better salesman than an engineer or technician.
That is a very good explanation. He is saying the same thing that I said, but his explanations are probably better (and a bit longer).
OK, I will use language as an excuse... English is not my first language.
The only thing he didn't mention is the side of effect of the smaller orifice that is used in all unbalanced first stages. This side effect is the reason why (marketing types) have given a bad reputation to unbalanced first stages in very deep dives. The problem is that the effect has been in most cases exaggerated and not explained well.
---------- Post added April 28th, 2014 at 07:52 PM ----------
Wow, I just realized who wrote that. That is very good!
I should have known.