WarmWaterDiver
Contributor
It would be odd to find no residue of aromatic hydrocarbons in the user's tanks in question, if there were aromatic hydrocarbons introduced into the tanks by the fill station apparatus.
The volatility of aromatic hydrocarbons are lower than their same carbon number non-aromatic isomers. Even at just a few psi pressure, something like toluene would have to be heated really, really hot to exist only as a vapor, and then the tank would have to be depressured to ambient pressure while it was hot to evacuate the tank from any potential liquid residue on the inner tank walls.
Lubricating oils have really low volatility - this is why they stand up to environments like an internal combustion engine's combustion chamber. Also, lubricating oils form thin tenacious films on surfaces that are hard to remove (which is why they make such good lubricants). If they were transferred into the tanks by the fill station equipment, they should be present on the insides of the tanks and in the regulator first stage internals.
I absolutely agree the probability of having 6 individual scuba tanks go 'bad' at the same time with no external agent at work is astronomically low. But lack of any hydrocarbon residues of the types under discussion here probably points to something with a relative volatility about on par with air.
edit - we do always ask lots of questions regarding fill station apparatus before we take a trip, and when renting tanks. it perplexes some dive operators, but when I explain our everyday work includes the potential need for SCBA and we're more familiar with industrial gas standards which are typically more stringent, everything's copacetic. Case in point, we're traveling to Curacao in June, and the dive shops have sent me scanned images of their most recent compressor quality control test certificates by e-mail with no hassles, just because I asked.
The volatility of aromatic hydrocarbons are lower than their same carbon number non-aromatic isomers. Even at just a few psi pressure, something like toluene would have to be heated really, really hot to exist only as a vapor, and then the tank would have to be depressured to ambient pressure while it was hot to evacuate the tank from any potential liquid residue on the inner tank walls.
Lubricating oils have really low volatility - this is why they stand up to environments like an internal combustion engine's combustion chamber. Also, lubricating oils form thin tenacious films on surfaces that are hard to remove (which is why they make such good lubricants). If they were transferred into the tanks by the fill station equipment, they should be present on the insides of the tanks and in the regulator first stage internals.
I absolutely agree the probability of having 6 individual scuba tanks go 'bad' at the same time with no external agent at work is astronomically low. But lack of any hydrocarbon residues of the types under discussion here probably points to something with a relative volatility about on par with air.
edit - we do always ask lots of questions regarding fill station apparatus before we take a trip, and when renting tanks. it perplexes some dive operators, but when I explain our everyday work includes the potential need for SCBA and we're more familiar with industrial gas standards which are typically more stringent, everything's copacetic. Case in point, we're traveling to Curacao in June, and the dive shops have sent me scanned images of their most recent compressor quality control test certificates by e-mail with no hassles, just because I asked.