- Messages
- 20,633
- Reaction score
- 20,172
- Location
- Philadelphia and Boynton Beach
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
SB friends,
Several posters have brought up a very important point, the influence of different kinds of diving on your RMV. My intent, when initially posting this in the Basic Scuba Discussions forum, was mainly to address recreational/sport diving, but, that was not explicitly stated. Clearly, there is a very wide spectrum represented by recreational diving, technical diving, single cylinder, doubles, multiple cylinders, wetsuit, drysuit, warm water, cold water, current, no current, good visibility, bad visibility, challenges on the dive, an easy dive, great effort, little effort.....and many other variables. Obviously, one's RMV data is most useful to the diver that generated it, under the conditions in which it was generated.
I have learned quite a lot from calculating my RMV. I have my RMV for 1364 of my last 1380 dives, over the last 9 years. My diving is relatively narrowly focused, mostly recreational, 5% light deco, all back mounted single, with or without one additional slung cylinder, all wet. However, I have dived under a very wide range of conditions. I did not start measuring my RMV until I had about 500 dives, it has improved only a little since then, but, the variation has decreased. Fully 95% of my dives are within +/- 0.08 cf/min of the average. Feeling cold, not necessarily diving in cold water, is a major determinate of my RMV, as or more important than relative effort. I use a little over my average RMV for routine gas planning and this works very well. However, I use twice my average RMV for contingency planning. I have not had the need to try that one out, yet.
For each of you, I hope your RMV helps with your diving and gas planning. The main reason for posting the poll was to give us all a very general idea of the approximate distribution of the RMV
Good diving, Craig
Several posters have brought up a very important point, the influence of different kinds of diving on your RMV. My intent, when initially posting this in the Basic Scuba Discussions forum, was mainly to address recreational/sport diving, but, that was not explicitly stated. Clearly, there is a very wide spectrum represented by recreational diving, technical diving, single cylinder, doubles, multiple cylinders, wetsuit, drysuit, warm water, cold water, current, no current, good visibility, bad visibility, challenges on the dive, an easy dive, great effort, little effort.....and many other variables. Obviously, one's RMV data is most useful to the diver that generated it, under the conditions in which it was generated.
I have learned quite a lot from calculating my RMV. I have my RMV for 1364 of my last 1380 dives, over the last 9 years. My diving is relatively narrowly focused, mostly recreational, 5% light deco, all back mounted single, with or without one additional slung cylinder, all wet. However, I have dived under a very wide range of conditions. I did not start measuring my RMV until I had about 500 dives, it has improved only a little since then, but, the variation has decreased. Fully 95% of my dives are within +/- 0.08 cf/min of the average. Feeling cold, not necessarily diving in cold water, is a major determinate of my RMV, as or more important than relative effort. I use a little over my average RMV for routine gas planning and this works very well. However, I use twice my average RMV for contingency planning. I have not had the need to try that one out, yet.
For each of you, I hope your RMV helps with your diving and gas planning. The main reason for posting the poll was to give us all a very general idea of the approximate distribution of the RMV
Good diving, Craig