Well presented, although at one point I almost suspected that you were trying to recommend that diver learn to die gracefully, rather than panic while they're drowing
I keyed in on this particular part:
If training drills are only conducted in clear-cut, easily definable sequences, then the diver will only develop the capacity to utilise those skills within clear-cut, easily definable circumstances. Whilst individual divers will possess different natural capacities to improvise and problem solve, the instructor can be pro-active in developing this capacity as a skill. Neglecting the development of this essentially reduces student safety to the base-line of their genetic pre-disposition for problem solving. The ability to maintain a flexible approach, improvise and apply existing skills under novel circumstances to achieve a safe outcome is beneficial for all divers.
However, it must be recognised that any personal capacity to problem-solve is ultimately determined by the individuals' reaction to, and threshold for, tolerable stress, as previously mentioned. In short, the ability to problem solve is the preserve of divers who have the psychological capacity to resist instinctive, acute stress reaction and apply intelligence and rational thinking under stress. An instructor can develop this as a skill, but cannot develop the divers' psychological traits that determine whether they can utilise the skill under stress. Psychological stress thresholds will always determine whether skills can be applied.
To apply this pragmatically, what we really have here are various pool exercises - - and more importantly, they need to be is non-discrete. What I mean by this is that after a student has been taught (a) mask clearing, (b) regulator recovery, (c) etc ... they need to be given a scenario where they need to do both, but it is up to their own problem-solving to decide the order (sequence) in which to solve their problems. This is where there's many great old pool drills that have been kicked to the curb as "unrealistic" play their part: an exercise that helps a student to learn how to problem-solve while he only has one breath of air doesn't need to be pedentically 'high fidelity' realistic, because that's not yet the objective. The objective is to introduce a problem with a controlled stressor to let the student (a) experience it, and (b) work it out on his own. Students who have problems can be given some tips for how to solve the puzzle (eg, establishing an air supply is more important than a cleared mask, etc). And in letting the student Do It Himself ultimately becomes a Confidence-Builder that will reduce the likelihood of panic when they're ever confronted with a real problem on a real dive. Of course, the trade-off is that doing this requires time, and we all know that they're pressure to minimize the instructor's time investment. Nevertheless, it is a core element to what ultimately defines a diver who is comfortable in the water and thus, one who will be more likely to continue with the sport, rather than to be afraid of it.
It has been too many years to be sure that I'm 100% correct on the names of these various sorts of controlled pool exercises, but two that I can still recall are:
Doff N Don (or Remove & Recover):
A) Doff:
- with kit on, dive to bottom of pool;
- remove all gear (make a pile on the bottom); turn tank air valve off;
- Surface (caution: air embolism risk if fail to exhale on ascent).
B) Don:
- freedive down to bottom of pool;
- sort through gear pile; stay down until you've put it all on;
- surfacei in full kit.
"NAUI Bailout(?)":
- stand at edge of pool, with entire kit on left arm; tank valve has been turned off;
- exhale & drop in; sink to bottom of pool;
- put all gear on;
- surface
Are any of these "realistic" to real world scenarios? Of course not. But what they do have are the core elements to most dive problems: the disruption of equipment and/or air supply. Two of these drills employ freedive breathholding as a means to artificially introduce a time constraint ... and stress ... on the problem-solving. If the student decides that they can't do it, they can generally bail out safely and return to the surface, to regroup and try again. And the "Doff" exercise will usually reveal to the student some challenges on buoyancy control as they disassemble their kit. And if we want to kick this up another notch, we might also consider bringing back (mild) harassment sessions too, earlier in a diver's training timeline too.
Finally, what my observation has been of these sorts of drills is that some students looked forward to them as a challenge, while another segment more-or-less dreaded the idea. But at the end of the day, everyone was successful and was really glad that they tried it and were gratified with their accomplishments.
-hh