rstofer
Contributor
Of course the manufacturer's recommendations are related to lawsuits. They don't want to have to defend themselves if a diver takes a warm water regulator beneath the ice cap.
And, yes, they did have to pick a number. Typically, that number is 50 deg F and that may be an industry defacto standard temperature even if there isn't a trade association behind it.
But the number is what it is: the limit below which the manufacturer is no longer willing to warrant the performance of their product.
So, why in the world would anybody else want to warrant it? Oh, wait! Nobody is saying "Yes, I personally guarantee that under every circumstance the regulator will function in cold water!" What they are really saying is "Go ahead and take the chance that the manufacturer is wrong but if the reg fails it is because your technique was deficient. Don't call me!"
Yes, the manufacturer is covering their ass. That's what they are supposed to do!
Richard
And, yes, they did have to pick a number. Typically, that number is 50 deg F and that may be an industry defacto standard temperature even if there isn't a trade association behind it.
But the number is what it is: the limit below which the manufacturer is no longer willing to warrant the performance of their product.
So, why in the world would anybody else want to warrant it? Oh, wait! Nobody is saying "Yes, I personally guarantee that under every circumstance the regulator will function in cold water!" What they are really saying is "Go ahead and take the chance that the manufacturer is wrong but if the reg fails it is because your technique was deficient. Don't call me!"
Yes, the manufacturer is covering their ass. That's what they are supposed to do!
Richard