ANOAAT Cozumel

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

There are a couple of issues that it would be nice to know what the position ANOAAT has on them.
1) Permits, any chance that the park will go to (and actually enforce) a use it or lose it policy? They should know how often a permit is utilized by how many bracelet fees are collected. I would think there should be a minimum utilization rate and if not met the permit be relinquished. If there are unused permits sitting fallow in the jungle, while no new permits are being issued, you will have pirate boats oporating outside the regulation since it is a rigged system they can not participate in. Kinda like Taxi cab medallions.
2) Reef friendly sunscreen. I believe Cozumel was a pioneer with this at Xel Ha (still part of Cozumel I belive). It disgusting to watch the oil slick coming off a mega load of snorkelers and even worse to see certified vacation divers trowling it on during the surface intervals.

On the (1) - so they take a permit back that has some kind of value. Do they resell it at what price? Do they just void it? Very leary of the Uber phenomena as it relates to NYC/medallions and Cozumel/permits

On the (2) - that's an education thing, many people are clueless about it and shops I have dove with are great at speaking up about it - eradicate thru education
 
I suspect that the owners of unused permits are hoping to sell them for an arm and a leg...thereby putting their purchase out of reach of the average local guy that wants to start a dive business. Putting a time limit on how long they may remain unused would create some incentive to sell without gouging.
 
We WELCOME New Members - as long as they are operating legally with all permits, insurance, and business licenses, etc. in place or proof that they are in the process, we welcome them! We have many goals, but our main mission is to promote safety and quality for our guests!
I liked the FB page, but doubt I'd ever post to it. I do want to follow it. It's great that the various operators are organizing to work with the various departments, as well as protect the park. The island and the coast have changed so much in the 50 years since Isla Cancun was a coconut plantation with three residents, and I so fear it could all be ruined by all of the developments and cruise barges.

It'll be good to recognize those operating illegally, too. Anyone have any news about Navy boats recently stopping illegal boats in the park and sending them away, with customers onboard? You can hear things, but I can't find that news online.
 
This is great information, Christi. Thank you for posting and the Facebook page. I see the members are listed in the Cozumel4you link. This is important info.
 
This is great information, Christi. Thank you for posting and the Facebook page. I see the members are listed in the Cozumel4you link. This is important info.

I've looked at the Anoaat facebook page but don't see a Cozumel4you link?
 
Without any route for business owners to participate legally if they want to, this sounds a lot like the taxi mafia extended to a dive boat mafia. I hope I'm wrong.
 
Without any route for business owners to participate legally if they want to, this sounds a lot like the taxi mafia extended to a dive boat mafia. I hope I'm wrong.

Yes, you are actually wrong :) No one is trying to prevent anyone from working, and again, this is NOTHING new - everyone just needs to follow the same regulations, safety standards, etc.

@nokadive - the Czm4You link is in my original post
 
The price for permits has skyrocketed - there is a value there, what is it. I'd hope that what happened in NYC with medallions, the price thru the roof then the value plunging when Uber came along - I'd hope that scenario doesn't play out on the island.

If someone were looking at purchasing permits, you can get an uneasy feeling.......
 
After years of no restrictions on the number of boats, divers, and fishermen visiting Cozumel's reefs, studies were undertaken to look for ways to mitigate the damage being done by so much traffic. A design was developed that established a underwater park, divided into zones. These different zones were delineated according to the different levels of activities that could be undertaken in each zone. Some zones were allowed to sustain more activity, some less, and these zones could be modified in the future according to the way the reefs responded to these activities. In addition to the studies regarding activity zones, other studies were undertaken to determine how many divers and boats these zones could accommodate. An upper limit was established and a plan implemented to issue permits for operators. A set number of permits was made available that would limit the park operators to this number to insure the maximum level of activity permissible on the reefs was not exceeded. Once these permits were issued, the maximum possible number of boats/divers was fixed and no more permits were supposed to be issued (although a few more apparently were).

Permits are allowed to be traded, sold or transferred. It doesn't matter to the park who has a permit, it only matters that whoever has a permit obeys the park rules and that the number of permits (and therefore the amount of activity) does not exceed the amount allowed for a healthy reef, as established by the previously mentioned studies.

The excuses that non-permitted operators are putting forward to try to get new permits issued above the limits established are self-serving and not in the interest of the health of the reefs. There are previously-issued permits available for trade or purchase. Just because the non-permitted operators don't want to offer enough to entice one of these permit holders to sell them their under-utilized permits, it doesn't mean that they should have a right to have a permit issued beyond the establish limit allowed.

That being said, the limit on the number of permits was established based on the amount of activity that could take place without negatively impacting the reefs. If this maximum amount of park activity is not being reached due to unused or under-utilized permits, the park should set a minimum use level for each permit. If this minimum use level is not being met, the permit should be revoked and re-issued. Use it or loose it.
 
Back
Top Bottom