ANOAAT Cozumel

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

After years of no restrictions on the number of boats, divers, and fishermen visiting Cozumel's reefs, studies were undertaken to look for ways to mitigate the damage being done by so much traffic. A design was developed that established a underwater park, divided into zones. These different zones were delineated according to the different levels of activities that could be undertaken in each zone. Some zones were allowed to sustain more activity, some less, and these zones could be modified in the future according to the way the reefs responded to these activities. In addition to the studies regarding activity zones, other studies were undertaken to determine how many divers and boats these zones could accommodate. An upper limit was established and a plan implemented to issue permits for operators. A set number of permits was made available that would limit the park operators to this number to insure the maximum level of activity permissible on the reefs was not exceeded. Once these permits were issued, the maximum possible number of boats/divers was fixed and no more permits were supposed to be issued (although a few more apparently were).

Permits are allowed to be traded, sold or transferred. It doesn't matter to the park who has a permit, it only matters that whoever has a permit obeys the park rules and that the number of permits (and therefore the amount of activity) does not exceed the amount allowed for a healthy reef, as established by the previously mentioned studies.

The excuses that non-permitted operators are putting forward to try to get new permits issued above the limits established are self-serving and not in the interest of the health of the reefs. There are previously-issued permits available for trade or purchase. Just because the non-permitted operators don't want to offer enough to entice one of these permit holders to sell them their under-utilized permits, it doesn't mean that they should have a right to have a permit issued beyond the establish limit allowed.

That being said, the limit on the number of permits was established based on the amount of activity that could take place without negatively impacting the reefs. If this maximum amount of park activity is not being reached due to unused or under-utilized permits, the park should set a minimum use level for each permit. If this minimum use level is not being met, the permit should be revoked and re-issued. Use it or loose it.

As usual, perfectly articulated El Graduado. I couldn't have stated it more precisely if I tried.

I think the majority position of ANOAAT on the unused permits is in agreement with you too "use it or lose it"

@ChuckP - as far as the "price" for permits skyrocketing - the owners of current permits set their price. It's very simple supply and demand economics. However, there ARE permit holders out there selling permits for reasonable prices - no one is going to give them away though. An average going rate range is $2500 - $4000 per seat. So for example, permits for a 6 passenger boat would go for $15,000 - $24,000 on average. For a one-time business investment that will yield that payback in under a year, that's not outrageous by any definition.
 
I think the majority position of ANOAAT on the unused permits is in agreement with you too "use it or lose it"

However, it would seem to be in the park's best interests for permits to go unused. An idle permit isn't adding diver pressure to the marine park or taking up enforcement resources. I don't know what pct permits are idle but if 100% were being fully utilized that would have to result in an increase in number of divers on the reefs each day.
 
However, it would seem to be in the park's best interests for permits to go unused. An idle permit isn't adding diver pressure to the marine park or taking up enforcement resources. I don't know what pct permits are idle but if 100% were being fully utilized that would have to result in an increase in number of divers on the reefs each day.

Except each diver is also paying for a park pass, less divers = less park passes sold = less revenue for the marine park.
 
Except each diver is also paying for a park pass, less divers = less park passes sold = less revenue for the marine park.

Diver fee revenue versus diver damage. If they wanted more revenue they could issue more permits. They have clearly made their decision.
 
Diver fee revenue versus diver damage. If they wanted more revenue they could issue more permits. They have clearly made their decision.

Unless they don't have enough revenue to pay for things and then they will issue more permits. It is a delicate balance, one that a lot of communities are working at balancing.
 
Don’t know if this tidbit will help you figure out why CONANP does what it does with permits and fees, or makes it more confusing, but here it is: All the CONANP fees collected go into one national pot and then get dispersed between almost 200 other national parks and protected areas for the cost of their administration. The fees collected in Cozumel don’t stay in Cozumel. Some of these 200 or so places get more than they collect in fees, and some places (like I assume Cozumel) gets less of this disbursement than they collected in fees. Kind of like PEMEX and oil extraction. The benefits from the sale of petroleum products don’t go to just the oil-producing states, it goes into the federal budget and then gets spread around.

The number of permits issued in Cozumel really doesn’t affect the amount of this pie Cozumel ends up getting back.
 
Don’t know if this tidbit will help you figure out why CONANP does what it does with permits and fees, or makes it more confusing, but here it is: All the CONANP fees collected go into one national pot and then get dispersed between almost 200 other national parks and protected areas for the cost of their administration. The fees collected in Cozumel don’t stay in Cozumel. Some of these 200 or so places get more than they collect in fees, and some places (like I assume Cozumel) gets less of this disbursement than they collected in fees. Kind of like PEMEX and oil extraction. The benefits from the sale of petroleum products don’t go to just the oil-producing states, it goes into the federal budget and then gets spread around.

The number of permits issued in Cozumel really doesn’t affect the amount of this pie Cozumel ends up getting back.


I think more like "crumbs" is what Cozumel gets back from the pie...
 
Back
Top Bottom