I don't think it's fair to categorize any measurable percentage of SB members as absolutely anti-hunting. Heck, there are some that seem to be all for hunting and even poaching on some threads. If someone wants to hunt to feed themselves and friends / family a fresh meal, I'm totally fine with that, as long as they're not shooting sharp pointy spears while I'm in the water! I do have a problem with those who bend the rules and interpret them to suit themselves, like possession limits on lobster, or worse, bragging on Facebook about getting lobster after being on a multiyear probation for violating F&G regulations due to confusion, misunderstanding, naivety, or just plain stupidity.
As far as the article referenced, I don't think seafood is any different than most any other food source. The reality is nobody really wants to know where their food comes from, they just want it to appear. Just like electricity, water, gasoline, or inexpensive clothing and shoes. Never mind the ecological impact it took to supply the item, or the cost in human terms. It's certainly not in the interest of any supplier to let consumers peek behind the curtain to see all the dark, unpleasant secrets. Even plant based food consumption isn't immune from the problems, as GMO plants and various pesticides and chemicals create their own problems. The "civilized" world is based on just having everything available, and not worrying about how
Ultimately the blame is everywhere, the suppliers, the consumers, and the media and government. All bend the rules, turn their heads and ignore a lot of inconvenient truths. At some point, the environment will reach a tipping point and something has to give. Maybe keeping a torch and pitchfork handy to fend off all the others in a post-apocalyptic world is the solution, and in the mean time continue to chow down on as much seafood as possible, no matter where it comes from or how it's obtained