A computer generally speaking is designed with multilevel diving in mind and, like multilevel tables such as the PADI wheel, uses NDL's that are a bit more conservative than a table.
So yes, if you are doing a square profile, you can get a few more minutes out of a table than a computer as the computer will be more conservative in that situation. But if you are doing a multilevel dive, you will get more time out of the computer than you would having to be more conservative (ie: next greatest depth and time, etc) in using your tables. Interestingly, I have also found that the algorithm in my current computer allows me more time at depths below 140 feet than the US Navy tables, so the presumed advantage of tables on square profiles is not always a sure thing.
In my case I was fine with tables and eventually with a PADI wheel when I started doing multilevel dives, but I found a computer made a whole lot more sense when I started doing high altitude dives. Correcting for the altitude in addition to the multilevel planning is just a bit too much. And trying to do the math on the fly at 130 feet on air is a really bad idea. A computer just makes a lot more sense.
I will plan the dive and develop a worst case contingency plan for deco in the event the computer fails during the dive, but I will follow the advice of the computer during the dive as it is franlky very good at figuring the the N2 and O2 obligations and it lets me concentrate on other things during the dive.
So yes, if you are doing a square profile, you can get a few more minutes out of a table than a computer as the computer will be more conservative in that situation. But if you are doing a multilevel dive, you will get more time out of the computer than you would having to be more conservative (ie: next greatest depth and time, etc) in using your tables. Interestingly, I have also found that the algorithm in my current computer allows me more time at depths below 140 feet than the US Navy tables, so the presumed advantage of tables on square profiles is not always a sure thing.
In my case I was fine with tables and eventually with a PADI wheel when I started doing multilevel dives, but I found a computer made a whole lot more sense when I started doing high altitude dives. Correcting for the altitude in addition to the multilevel planning is just a bit too much. And trying to do the math on the fly at 130 feet on air is a really bad idea. A computer just makes a lot more sense.
I will plan the dive and develop a worst case contingency plan for deco in the event the computer fails during the dive, but I will follow the advice of the computer during the dive as it is franlky very good at figuring the the N2 and O2 obligations and it lets me concentrate on other things during the dive.