Forbin's Descent
Contributor
And my “Adavanced” training…Without further ado, the Diver’s Log pages from my PADI 5 Star Training…
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
And my “Adavanced” training…Without further ado, the Diver’s Log pages from my PADI 5 Star Training…
Without further ado, the Diver’s Log pages from my PADI 5 Star Training…
It doesn't look like your instructor had any F's to give. He was all tapped out. Wow, just wow.And my “Adavanced” training…
Well, then, isn't that special?Without further ado, the Diver’s Log pages from my PADI 5 Star Training…
I remember signing a credit card receipt.Well, then, isn't that special?
I hope you also had a Student Record File, a beige folder that is identical to the first pages of the book. The book is your record; they keep the SRF. You and the instructor should have signed both. Did you sign the SRF? Did you even see it?
Look at the list of skills for the confined water dives. Did you do all of them?
Look at the OW dives. You will see what skills are supposed to be done on them. Did you do them?
To be blunt, this is a disaster. You should contact PADI about both courses.
So you had a similar experience with poor training. Was it with PADI as well or another agency?I was certified much more than 20 years ago, and it was also done in 3 days. It was not until I became a DM years later that I realized how many standards were skipped to make that happen. I should have known, because I can look at my original logbook and see how many skills my instructor signed for that we did not actually do. I never looked. Why would I?
And you should stick to your commitment to not throw out inside jokes and expect the world to laugh at them. I laugh a lot, often at the stuff on SB.You know, it helps to have a sense of humor and laugh once in a while. You should try it.
Well, the limit is set at 60 ft. So there must be some difference between 50 and 70 ft?It isn't, but planning a 100 foot dive is different than a 60 foot dive, at least it is for the way I teach it. The problem is that standards allow for a much shallower than 100 foot dive is allowed. So you could get your AOW with a deep dive to 61 feet (for any active PADI instructors, feel free to correct that by citing the standards which are not in front of me right now). I know a local instructor who did that for a student who was scared to dive deep.
I think that was a huge disservice to the student.
You make me laugh - at some of the stuff you post.And you should stick to your commitment to not throw out inside jokes and expect the world to laugh at them. I laugh a lot, often at the stuff on SB.
Sure, the pressure goes up by 0.6. Unless you are highly susceptible to narcosis, I don't think it matters that much from that, as when it comes to technical diving, an END of 100 feet is the target for gas selection. Gas consumption goes up, but not a huge amount. I don't have dive software/tables to compare NDLs at those two depths.Well, the limit is set at 60 ft. So there must be some difference between 50 and 70 ft?
I think you are missing the point, perhaps on purpose. For the OW class and less than 60 ft dives, planning is minimal. For the Deep dive of AOW, and eh Deep specialty, planning is critical. Gas goes away faster, narcosis is possible, CESAs are more problematic, and it may be darker and gloomier and colder. Ideally, you'd go to 100 ft to actually experience all this that is different on a deep dive, but at least you can be made aware of it and plan for it...even at 70 ft.Well, the limit is set at 60 ft. So there must be some difference between 50 and 70 ft?