FPDocMatt
Contributor
Steve's talking about CCRs, which are the only diving equipment at present which can maintain a constant ppO2.
Ah, I see.
On a CCR, you are rebreathing the gas in the loop until or unless you inject some more gas, so the ppO2 will slowly fall as you metabolize the oxygen.
Makes sense.
In addition, if you are at .21 at 33 feet, the ppO2 will fall as you ascend, and you'd be at .1 by the time you got close to the surface -- UNLESS you add O2.
Does the CCR have the capability of adding more oxygen? I know there is some kind of rebreather setup that involves adding more oxygen as needed. Of course, I understand you wouldn't do this just to ascend, if your ppO2 were 1.2 so you didn't have to.
There are three considerations in choosing diving gases: Oxygen toxicity, narcosis, and decompression. The more oxygen you can have in your breathing mixture, the less decompression you have to do. The choice of other gases to use in a breathing mixture is not very broad -- there aren't that many gases from which to choose, and many of them are toxic. Of the ones which aren't poisonous or anesthetic, many are narcotic. It has come down to nitrogen and helium because they are available, nontoxic, relatively affordable, and helium is virtually non-narcotic. Although there are controversies about the comparative behavior of nitrogen and helium in decompression, I think it's legitimate to say that both require attention to ascents rates and times. Minimizing inert gas makes for shorter deco, but raises oxygen toxicity risk. GUE, the agency through which I have some of my training, chooses to keep a relatively low ppO2 (1.2 or lower) for long exposures, but most of us will tolerate 1.4 for shorter dives, and 1.6 on deco, where there is very little exertion and the exposures are generally fairly short.
That's very clear, thank-you. It also explains some of the historical stuff I read in the Navy Diving Manual. I need to re-read that part, I bet it'll make a lot more sense now.
So you increase the oxygen as much as safely possible in order to decrease decompression time.
Is this ppO2 not going above 1.4 (or 1.6 for short periods) what's behind the Maximum Operating Depth (MOD) of enriched air nitrox? The MOD would then be the depth at which the ppO2 of your mixture reached or approached 1.4?
I've heard that oxygen causes narcosis as well, but people talk as if increasing oxygen and decreasing nitrogen reduced narcosis.
My understanding of why you don't just use heliox at depth instead of trimix is:
1. Helium needs longer decompression times than nitrogen.
2. You're more likely to get chilled breathing helium.
3. Helium is more expensive.
4. Helium causes high pressure nervous syndrome.
Is this correct?2. You're more likely to get chilled breathing helium.
3. Helium is more expensive.
4. Helium causes high pressure nervous syndrome.
I must say I find all this gas stuff fascinating.