notabob
Contributor
The classic method of dealing with current is to swim out on your course, turn and swim back on your course. You will have actually done two sides of a triangle. You then turn and swim directly into the current to your starting point.
Ah! But if you want to get to a certain location at a site that you know to be on a certain heading from the entry point, and you simply maintain that heading, you might end up carried quite a ways away from it by the current. For example, there's this neat old 6-7ft anchor in the rocks at Cathedral, apprximately on a 150 course from 20yds out from the entry rock. I know that to get to it, my course needs to be about 150. But if there's any current, I need to adjust my actual heading in order to get to it. Simply following the 150 heading in a current will get me somewhere else, downstream from the anchor. In my opinion your method would work just fine in an open space, where the bottom is fairly uniform, depth-wise. On a typical shore dive, though, the 3rd leg would end up parallel to the shore and very close to it.
The best method if your going to head out and back on the same line is to pay more attention to specific things than to the compass, using your compass only to make sure you're heading in a straight line. Then when you swim back, you use both the compass bearing as well as the natural navigation.
Very true. Ultimately, combining compass and natural navigation ends up being the best way to navigate, but familiarity with the compass and knowing how to navigate by it is still a very important skill, especially when the visibility is on the poor side and you're not familiar with the site enough to know the location of every ghost trap and boulder there. You may remember passing by a certain boulder on the way out, but if you're even no more than 10ft off on the way back on a bad vis day, you'll never see it!
-Roman.