10 easy ways to protect the environment during your holidays

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Me too!!! but what I find even more incredible is the amount of divers who have no idea about how bad this is for the reef. this info should be part of everyone's open water course. Dont you think?

That would be wonderful! I gotta believe Stream 2 Sea is getting the word out to dive shops. I know our dive shop has it at the register, so maybe they're making the point in training these days?
 
How about choosing destinations, hotels, and dive operators that strive to be eco-friendly or base their business around that? Vote with your dollars and support properly-run ecotourism. Much more effective than not using straws.

Check out dive destinations that are closer to home.

Find out if there are local stewardship organizations that protect the places you're diving (local or travel) and donate to them.

Carbon offsets for air travel aren't that expensive for one trip, I use them sometimes. If you personally don't like or trust the carbon offset businesses you can make an equivalent donation to a climate organization of your choice when you travel.

Buy dive gear made in first-world countries that have actual labor and pollution standards, even if that gear is more expensive because of it. Seems asinine to save $50 on a regulator if the waste chemicals from metal plating it are dumped directly into some river in china that flows into the ocean where you will be diving.


Sorry bro, no way you can paint dropping literally tons of C02 per person as environmentally concerned. Not to mention the effects of the metals mined to make those vehicles, the resources used to make the airports etc. It would literally be more environmentally responsible if possible and long enough bridges existed if every single passenger drove themselves there one person per car instead of using commercial air travel. Trying to spin it like we're some kind of environmental superhero for not using straws while dumping tons of poison into the atmosphere, the very water we're going to dive and the land we live on is just sad.
This is partially true. But also somewhat defeatist. It IS possible and good to make better choices, even if small. I agree that that there are bigger (though more difficult) issues to address than straws. I'm not sure if driving over huge bridges to the Caribbean really would be better. It would be interesting to math it out. Concerned air travelers can offset their carbon impact by supporting environmental projects directly, or buying carbon offsets that do. That is a real way to make flying okay.

Also, the link in your signature has some serious anti-environment crock that makes your whole post seem disingenuous . Overfishing is a huge, immediate, and direct threat to the places we love to dive. The organization you promote is against fishing vessel monitoring and marine protected areas. Like WHAT?
 
Trying to spin it like we're some kind of environmental superhero for not using straws while dumping tons of poison into the atmosphere, the very water we're going to dive and the land we live on is just sad.
I personally find that running a commercial spearfishing operation and supporting an organization that tries to maximize commercial fishing while writing that is quite hypocritical. The fishes you take, including the one proudly shown in your picture, are those that environmentally aware divers will never see. I do not believe that we should reduce pollution to support more fishing, and the damage that you make in few days is certainly much more than what an environmentally respectful diver can make booking an economy airplane seat to Asia.
 
Sometimes we need to see places to know that we want and need to save then. Isn't that the principal behind zoos and aquariums?
Whether it is effective is another question. But I was going to put it more in terms of reducing poaching and habitat loss by offering tourism as a way for local populations to make a living. That may not be the best solution, but it does seem to be a reasonable interim solution until better ways are implemented. If tourists stopped flying in to visit the reefs, how many more locals would turn to, say, dynamite fishing or shrimp farming?
 

Back
Top Bottom