- Messages
- 20,467
- Reaction score
- 19,812
- Location
- Philadelphia and Boynton Beach
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Not opposed, rather in addition to.
It's simply amazing that all the scientists conducting all those experiments over all those decades not only never thought of this, they never noticed those obvious results in their experiments. Those that are still alive will no doubt feel like total dunces once they read your analysis. Why didn't we think of that? How did we not notice those effects in our test subjects? I cannot wait until you publish your analysis and we get the ensuing cataclysmic change in dive theory. Once you have proven that all previous dive theory is wrong, you will justifiably be honored as the new father of modern dive theory.
1L of fat = 0.9 kg fat
1L of fat will hold 0,063g N2 when saturated at 30 meters or 100ft.
Peter: 25x0.063 = 1.6kg N2
Paul: 31.5x0.063 = 2 kg N2
I think you have made a 1000 fold error here, from g to kg. I suspect Paul has completely dissolved all the N2 in his Ali80 by this point.
I think you have made a 1000 fold error here, from g to kg. I suspect Paul has completely dissolved all the N2 in his Ali80 by this point.
I checked you are right I mixed up the decimal's mark, that caused the shift. I thank you warmly, I run the math again following the same logic hopefully on Friday I will find the time and see what values turn out and share back.