I ... rarely dive WITH a wetsuit -- it has to be pretty warm water and a short, single dive for me to dive wet.
when I dive Maui with a single Al80 and a wetsuit, I have all my weight on my cambands and it's not ditchable.
A diver who rescued me could bring me to the surface, and once there, make me buoyant with my BC.
I don't see this as being a big issue.
And it certainly shouldn't be a big issue, especially when reminded that the DIR essence is the Team and Standardisation. A good team member will do all of the above rescue, maybe even blindfolded if needed, because of the familiarity with your kit, such is the strength of redundancy in DIR.
Less straightforward if unfortunate enough to be buddied with someone less skilled - for both parties:
I once witnessed an experienced cold water diver buddied to a young rec diver who was PADI trained whilst on a backpacking vacation. It was tropical but he was using his drysuit because he was comfortable in it and didn't want to rent gear. He also had an Aqualung i3 integrated BCD inflator/deflator.
You can image her eyes popping out as he explained his gear to her during BWRAF! She had no concept of drysuit buoyancy control let alone the use of his BCD! If a rescue ascent was needed, I doubt if it would have been controlled.
Understand the foundation of DIR is:
- Team
- Standardization
DIR is about less gear, less gear task loading.
There is no question that a fully kitted DIR team would be able to execute a tropical rec muck dive perfectly safely; with drysuits, longhoses and twinsets if they wish. Scooters and freedive fins might raise some eyebrows - hunting those hidden critters means going really close and really, really slow!
But if DIR is *also* about less gear and less gear task loading, then in that same environment the DIR team will find others with far less gear and far less gear task loading and also diving safely too.
This is what I mean by saying that DIR principles starting to fall apart when transplanting the ideas to the rec environment because the high level of safety and redundancy this system provides for cave diving, becomes excessively complex and burdensome in the rec environment where regularly 5, and occasionally up to 7 dives a day are organised.
How can the DIR team not give up the Team, the Standardisation or Minimal Gear whilst still claiming to be best optimised or prepared for that kind of diving? To give away any of the above, surely means moving away from DIR. Keeping them, surely means a level of unnecessary task loading which is also not DIR.
For thread compliance, I think there are parallels with the options for descent. If the concept of a 'best' method for a particular situation exists, then as situations change so should the methods.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk