Next, he'll be spouting off about your snow bound Canadian Fortress.I note you are from Canada. You have an excuse for your ignorance.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Priceless.
:fortress:
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Next, he'll be spouting off about your snow bound Canadian Fortress.I note you are from Canada. You have an excuse for your ignorance.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Priceless.
I am reminded of an incident in Lake Denton, Florida. It had been a long time habit for dive masters and instructors to feed turtles those little canned Vienna sausages and they had become fairly aggressive. While I had never fed a turtle, I knew of their aggressive nature and cautioned my students to never ever point at a turtle. One such student was quite surprised when he lost the tip of his finger when he didn't follow my directions. His mother was livid that I would endanger her son by exposing him to aggressive wildlife. I believe she even wanted to sue me and I thought that my career as an instructor was coming to an end. Then dad showed up. He asked his son if I did tell him not to point at turtles. He admitted that I had. He then asked his son why he still pointed. He answered that he simply didn't believe me. He slapped the son on the back of his head, said something like "That's just more proof that you can't be mine" and escorted the family away. I got an apology from the son, and he finished his training when his finger healed.
As far as I know, there have been three such incidents at Lake Denton. All involved pointing at the turtle. Turtles aren't dangerous: they are just dumb and hungry.
I was re-reading the first few pages to see where this ran aground. I did not know the OP's apparent history of posts on this subject (don't know if I would've voted or not had I heard about this). To me at the time, the poll itself did not, to me, reveal any agenda except his interest in how many attacks would deter divers from diving there. It was interesting to me, so I voted. I'm not sure what this poll will do to help with his agenda (so I hear). Who pays attention to polls anyway? I could say, Hey let's take a poll.
Now wasn't it yourself who was accused of having one of those?Next, he'll be spouting off about your snow bound Canadian Fortress.
:fortress:
Glad we agree. At some point, as the number of fatalities due to shark attack in an area increases, diving in that area becomes stupid or mad or both. The point of the thread was to investigate the point at which the risk became so high the diver would be deterred from diving. I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions from the poll so far. I will simply note that the previous comments by Jim and the poll do demonstrate the inability of divers to think logically on this matter.
You've made a lot of foolish and unwise assumptions in this thread and have just added to them. Thousands of divers learn the craft in Lake Denton. There has been no jihad led against those terrorist turtles. If you don't provoke the animal, you're not going to be molested. Pointing at turtles who have been fed Vienna sausages, which are about the size of a finger, is a provocation. Most the divers I know of that have been attacked, have provoked the attack in some manner: they've poked the pig. The fatality last year or year before in the Bahamas where they were feeding sharks: they poked the pig. The diver who kissed the Nurse shark: they poked the pig. Divers who shoot game with Mr Sharkey present: they're poking the pig too.I presume you are drawing a parallel here with the stupidity of divers who enter waters where the risk of a fatal shark attack is excessively high. Is that the case?
In the law suit against ScubaBoard by She who shall not be named, they accused one of our users of writing his attacks from the safety of his snowbound Canadian fortress. It was like reading a post from Foxfish on sharks in regard to it's overly vivid emotions backed by not a shred of actual evidence. I need a good laugh, so I'll probably go dig that out and read it today.Now wasn't it yourself who was accused of having one of those?
Referring back to my previous analogy, I am going to revise your statement with a different context:
At some point, as the number of fatalities due to downtown Denver muggings in Colorado increases, hiking in the mountain trails in Colorado becomes stupid or mad or both. The point of the thread was to investigate the point at which the risk of walking in one community became so high the walker would be deterred from walking in a different community.
You have never, ever shown any evidence that the risk to divers is high now or has ever been high in the past.
Would you jump in with scuba gear and no shark protection (ie. outside the cage) behind a boat with cage divers with a number of big, hungry, man-eating white pointers milling around? Would you agree with Rodney Fox that you'd have to be mad to do so? Yes or No?