What, they were gutted in Vancouver and towed to Nanaimo, or gutted near Nanaimo and then towed to snake island?
I don't remember exactly how it went but they didn't get to Nanaimo from Victoria or Vancouver under their own steam.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
What, they were gutted in Vancouver and towed to Nanaimo, or gutted near Nanaimo and then towed to snake island?
doesn't this make you wish you could take some of these petulant imbeciles on a "discover scuba dive" and show them the logging residue come crap that is there now and then to the Chaudiere or Cape Breton for comparison???
come on for crying out loud!!! The fish do not like or choose to inhabit flat desolate areas with no vegetation or food. They prefer to hide in protective structures like rocks and rubble. We have ruined how much natural habitat along the coast?? Why now is it that when a potential opportunity to give back to mother nature arises all the "head up own rectum" forces have to unite??
arrgh
Apparently they were towed from Vancouver to Nanaimo.
Huh.
I suspect that those who object to the sinking have already heard and understand this argument and it just doesn't matter to them. I believe their concern lies with the perception that their lifestyle will be disturbed by the hordes of noisy dive boats that will flood into the bay every day ad nauseum. But the reality is what....maybe one, maybe two boats a couple of times a week will actually show up. I'm sure they have more annoyance from the jetboats in the summer.
So it seems to me the fear has been put into the property owners by someone...I imagine the Bay's self-appointed leader...you know the type of person. There seems to be one in every neighborhood...the one who bullies and cajoles the rest into issues when there are no issues through the use of propaganda. So this group under that leadership is going to use any irrelevant means to to sidetrack the initiative when their real objection is the misguided worry about their peace and quiet when that problem really doesn't exist.
In summary, the leader of this group worries not a bit about the ecology of the bay, nor whether the area is too small for such a thing or any of the other reasons that are pulled out of the hat. This is a NIMBY thing and the argument against the sinking probably doesn't really represent the true feeling of all the residents but rather a select few. And they have a clever lawyer who likes to dig and find irrelevant reasons to object. This is going to be a tough one.![]()
Awesome news!!!
Attention tree huggers.... Suck it!:mooner: