I know that this is off topic, however a 600 yard swim vs the old 800 yard swim is kind of a weaker standard from the "old days". So the ULSA did lower thier standards.
Yes, the standards would seem lower, but as discoveries in exercise science improve, it may be possible to decrease distance, but also increase the speed that work must be performed. For example, a 600 in 10 minutes or less would be more challenging than 2 miles straight with no time limit. Like Thal says, "smart" training doesn't have to be "tough" training, but I don't think the industry is committed to either at this point. Since we've never defined what I, Slonda, or Thal ever meant by "tough" anyway, those in opposition can only imagine what we meant by that. The course structure that I posted is how I learned and basically what PDIC has been teaching ever since I started with them. The absolute minimum that an instructor can run a PDIC OW course is 7 days. Five days of class and pool and 2 days of open water. Working at PDIC HQ, we would normally run 6 - 8 sessions at other facilities for class and pool and 8 - 10 in our indoor pool at PDIC HQ. Then, open water dives would be conducted by different PDIC instructors in different areas to expose the student to different types of local and regional diving. We also try team teaching to reduce instructor dependency. No one is being forced to do push-ups, but students are expected to improve every skill by repetition. Doris Murphy, PDIC president, made us swim laps in snorkeling gear every class to strengthen our legs when wearing fins. Now, divers just have to do the 200 yard swim in a course once and use a split fin to compensate for a weak kick. Starting a class with a 200 - 500 snorkel then having the divers float their tanks on in the water and then ending the class with a 3 minute water tread in full gear and no air in the BCD isn't exactly ... :inquisition:
I apologize if I came off condesending. That wasnt my intentions, even though it came out that way after reading my post.
Your apology is accepted. In message boards, the intellectual sparring and Socratic debate without personal interaction, often is like a game of ping-pong played with logic rather than a ball. It often becomes a game. We try to best our opponents based upon facts presented and inventoried at the time. We also forget that we are sometimes playing against real people who have feelings and emotions rather than against the computer or just a myriad of profiles. Emotion also tends to make arguments heated at the time and people slam one another harder online than they would in person. Also, because tone of voice is lacking, sometimes the way we write carries unintended insult and one sentence can be taken different ways by different readers. You and I would probably have more in common in person than online. I spent some time living in Dade County in Coral Gables, hanging out with the guards from the Venetian Pool, training to work for Dade County as a lifeguard at the Tamiami pool, the atoll pool and Crandon Beach before taking a job that popped up in the Cayman Islands as a scuba instructor.
People who meet me think I'm from "The Valley" in California or some stoner surfer because of the accent of voice. They are shocked to find a brain behind it. I'm just passionate about diving and diver training. While it may seem like I'm Mike Nelson on the Net, in real-life I'd probably come off more like Keanu Reeves or the turtle from
Finding Nemo asking, "Why did you lose your dive buddy?" rather than "Do you have your exit buddy?"
I don't know about that, but back in the late '60s you needed to make a rather long swim (Manhattan Beach to Redondo Beach) staying in the surf break the entire way to qualify as an LA County Beach LifeGuard.
What was the distance swam? It may had been a long swim to some and not much of a challange to others. Long distances is subjective. As you know, if you dont run a lot, a 5K may very well be a long run. If you run marathons, a 5K is pretty short.
I am going to guess that Thal will say 2 - 2.5 miles.
Fair points. I've kept my mouth shut on this topic for the last few days.
The broad topic of "training quality" is too broad. Perhaps it makes sense to narrow it by dividing the broad topic into the following categories of training:
* Entry Level Recreational (single tank)
* Recreational Advanced (single tank)
* Scientific Entry Level
* Commercial
* Recreational Divemaster
* Recreational Instructor
Another interesting question is this: Should There Be a Recreational Certification At All? I think some posters here may question whether there should be, and that's fine. I'll respect that opinion, although I personally think there should recreational certifications.
IMHO, the important questions facing us are these:
1) Standards for Entry Level Recreational (IMHO too low with some agencies)
2) Standards for Recreational Professionals (IMHO way too low most agencies)
Just my opinion.
I think that diving needs to be all-inclusive. I love love love the fact that we now have Dive Heart, the HSA, and the IAHD! I think everyone should be allowed to dive, but the training needs to reflect the level of competency expected from a certification. As I've said before, why do we ask handicapped divers to give us their best that they can to overcome their disabilities, but we ask less and less of the 100% able-bodied to earn their certs with each passing year?
It would be nice to pull out a C-card and get to do the dives you are trained to do. In lifeguarding, we hire 15 year-old to work professionally as rescuers and we trust them to prevent drownings and save lives with CPR, First Aid, AED and O2. These are kids! I always asked my young lifeguards how is it that they can come work on the beach with me and make me proud every day with their professionalism, but they get in trouble at home and school? Yet, in diving, a 41 year-old agency training director who is a cave, trimix, wreck penetration, and lifeguard instructor cannot rent a tank to go shore diving from a shop in Bermuda or is told to not penetrate a wreck in 115 feet of water in the St. Lawrence by the captain?
I think a cert level should exist for everyone who wants to dive, but each level needs to really mean something. That way, we can get the freedom from dive operators to get the adventure back. Divers with 30 C-cards might not get themselves hurt, but they should be stellar divers by that point and strong divers and swimmers.
Rescue, DM, instructor and tech levels should be taken VERY seriously - more seriously than they are today. It's not just the accidents that define diving. The near misses DAN never hears about change the sport. How many times does a dive boat operation need to rescue tech divers who can't swim back to the boat in current before they say, sorry no tech diving? Or, how many times do instructors get in trouble the same way and need a DM to swim them a lifeline? A few occurrences of this and when you pull out your instructor card to prove you can handle a night dive, the shop balks because they know instructors aren't much different in ability than any other diver they've had to pluck from the sea.
Folks,
If you believe the quality of scuba training is so low that action should be taken, quit wasting time on scuba board and write the various industry training organizations requesting improvements or contact your legislative representatives requesting government regulation.
Besides, I could use a job in the Dept of Scuba Safety.
I attend RSTC meetings representing PDIC that have been set up by the industry for the sole purpose of preventing government regulation. PADI, SSI, SDI, IDEA, PDIC and the YMCA (now SEI and not currently attending) have been determining minimum training standards as a collective body for years. The little agencies usually push for higher standards at these meetings only to be defeated or surrender to the larger agencies. If you think things are bad now, they'd be far worse with government intervention.