ohmdiver
Contributor
Thanks Walter.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Any time a person dives, they have the opportunity to improve their skills. Lots of improvement comes while diving in shallow swimming pools. Buoyancy control is much more difficult when you are shallow than when you are deep. OTOH, there's a big difference psycologically between open and confined water. If you showed me a log with 50 open water dives and 200 aquarium dives, I would expect your skills to be slightly better than the typical diver with 50 dives, but you still have 50 dives and only 50 dives. FWIW, I would expect a diver with 50 dives to be quite skilled. I don't believe 50 dives is anything to be sneezed at, 50 dives is quite a few dives. he biggest changes that happen with a diver between 50 and 1000 dives have more to do with his mind than his actual dive skills. Typically, at 50 dives, a diver should be pretty damned good, but shouldn't really believe it yet. At 100 dives he's starting to believe it and maybe starting to get a little cocky which can start leading to stupid mistakes. At 500 dives, he's God's gift to diving and extremely confident which can kill the diver because he's more prone to taking short cuts. By 1000 dives, he's either killed himself, or come close and learned his lesson and realizes he's good, but he no longer cuts corners. He listens to suggestions and evaluates them, knowing there are still things to learn even from new divers. He's confident, knows his limits, but in relation to actual skills, he's not all that much better than he was at 50 dives and he knows it. His biggest advantage is he's seen lots of things go wrong and is better prepared for Murphy.
If you showed me a log with 50 open water dives and 200 aquarium dives, I would count you as having 50 dives and only 50 dives.
I would answer it there like I answered it here.
Fun thread; got me thinking if I could come up with a comparison people could relate to. In the aviation community you fly aircraft and practice flying in simulators. You log both in your flight log but in different sections. Flying is flying and there's no question that it counts for experience. Simulators though, as real as they make them nowadays, is still flying in an artificial environment to practice or enhance all the skills you use when flying. Simulator time is recognized, but weighted significantly less than actual flying. No professional aviator ever mentions simulator time when asked about flight experience, even if he/she has thousands of hours in a simulator.
There's no doubt about the benefit of simulator flying. Modern astronauts spend thousands of hours in simulators prior to spending their first couple hundred hours actually flying in space. Only the actual hours in space count for their astronaut wings.
In the big picture, it seems like there's a parallel here between actual open water diving and diving in an aquarium, a simulated open water environment.
There is a difference though. If you fail in the simulator you don't crash, burn, and die. You can drown in a pool or aquarium.![]()
Not true. There have been rare injuries due fires and hydraulic malfunctions, not to mention just plain clumsiness climbing into the simulator. Let's not forget the three astronauts who died in Apollo 1 during a simulation.