- Messages
- 10,949
- Reaction score
- 4,153
- # of dives
- None - Not Certified
After years of watching resort and dive operations, I can tell you that you are only viewing it from your perspective, not that of those who are making the rules.
The reason dive ops don't want you to breathe the air down past 500 psi and get real rabid about enforcing the same? (one of the symptoms of Caymania)
It all came about resulting from the corrosion damage that was being done to tanks, valves and rental regs when salt water seeped in after positive pressure was lost.
If you are looking at a rule, look for the real rea$on that caused it to be made.
IE: Smoking on airliners being banned. You think you know why?
Aeroflot (the Russian Airline and others, too) seems to be able to run great smelling planes with great air quality, yet still allowed smoking. Why? How? They continue to build aircraft that still are built with three "air packs" (air conditioners) that are heavy to carry, take up space, cost money to maintain- and use fuel to operate. Our US designs now specify 2 air pack planes and the no-smoking has little or nothing to do with health and safety- sure they may save on cleaning or cigarette burns- but airlines let the anti-smokers take the hit for what the corporations wanted. Cheaper operations~ the pilots resist even running more than one.
The dive op industry made no such cohesive plan to manipulate our behaviors or modify the process. They just didn't want corroded tanks. The urban legend of theoretical safety is a more understandable reason, although no more accurate for its widespread acceptance.
Follow the money... and the corrosion.
The reason dive ops don't want you to breathe the air down past 500 psi and get real rabid about enforcing the same? (one of the symptoms of Caymania)
It all came about resulting from the corrosion damage that was being done to tanks, valves and rental regs when salt water seeped in after positive pressure was lost.
If you are looking at a rule, look for the real rea$on that caused it to be made.
IE: Smoking on airliners being banned. You think you know why?
Aeroflot (the Russian Airline and others, too) seems to be able to run great smelling planes with great air quality, yet still allowed smoking. Why? How? They continue to build aircraft that still are built with three "air packs" (air conditioners) that are heavy to carry, take up space, cost money to maintain- and use fuel to operate. Our US designs now specify 2 air pack planes and the no-smoking has little or nothing to do with health and safety- sure they may save on cleaning or cigarette burns- but airlines let the anti-smokers take the hit for what the corporations wanted. Cheaper operations~ the pilots resist even running more than one.
The dive op industry made no such cohesive plan to manipulate our behaviors or modify the process. They just didn't want corroded tanks. The urban legend of theoretical safety is a more understandable reason, although no more accurate for its widespread acceptance.
Follow the money... and the corrosion.