I think this topic highlights another issue with an emphasis on over-standardization of equipment, gases and protocols, particularly when it is overdone in the names of "consistency," "unification," "clarity," and "efficiency."
Some agencies seem to have created a culture of overemphasizing their approach and standards so much that it has warped people away from simpler, safer, more logical, and more correct processes that already existed.
Obviously, the cylinder labeling should always be re-considered and then correctly expressed before every dive, and immediately after gas analysis. If the exact type of sticker or label is a hangup, this is a perilous descent into over-conformity. The only rules are simple: it should be clearly visible, accurate for the next dive, and not fall off. (Many tape/marker combos can satisfy these requirements.)
The MOD shown on the cylinder can reflect more than just the oxygen content of the gas. The MOD depth on the cylinder should indicate the actual maximum depth that you plan for the gas to be used on the actual next dive(s). This obviously can change, even if the gas doesn't.
For an air diluent on a CCR dive, the MOD of ordinary air is now considered to be 40m (130') or even 35m, because of gas density. Its MOD should be labelled that way in this context. Maximum Operating Depth
ppO2 is only one of multiple things that could factor in. Dive plan could also factor in. Dive conditions and dive plans might influence the gas parameters you consider safe at planned depths. There is also gas density, and END, if that matters for the dive.
"Fixed permanent stickers" sounds like a recipe for mistaken assumptions, confusion above and below water, and accidents, should the parameters of the dives change, as in the example given originally