Optimal Pony Bottle Size for Failure at 100ft?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

You GUE guys need to come to terms that people are going to continue to use pony bottles for redundancy. It is a perfectly valid configuration for recreational diving. Just let it go.
I'm persuaded that for the most common flavors of rec diving there is usually a better alternative than a pony, but I'm not going to attempt to persuade anyone else. Go on, sling that thing! :)

Indeed, in post #2 I commended the OP for at least appearing to have thought through the gas usage estimate, which some pony-slingers likely don't.
 
Yet the seem to create almost as many problems as they solve. Maybe they aren't as valid as they appear.
What problems are those? I dived with pony bottles for many years. I just lost the preference. I don't see any problems they create. Mount it or sling it and go dive. What's so complicated?
 
I'm persuaded that for the most common flavors of rec diving there is usually a better alternative than a pony

My question would be....... do you believe that a pony is a better alternative than no redundancy at all?
 
My question would be....... do you believe that a pony is a better alternative than no redundancy at all?
I'm not GUE trained, but I believe they'd say that if you can't count on your buddy/team for your redundancy, you shouldn't make the dive.
 
I believe they'd add that when there is a marginal solution to a problem and a good one, you should choose the good one -- even if the marginal one might be better than nothing.

When there is a choice between two items of equipment with the same purpose, and one is clearly better than the other for a reason that affects risk and safety, the DIR philosophy insists that only use of the safer item is doing it right.
 
I'm not GUE trained, but I believe they'd say that if you can't count on your buddy/team for your redundancy, you shouldn't make the dive.
if that was put into practice, over 90% of the dives made wouldn't happen. While I love the quality of GUE training and recommend it ad nauseum, team based diving doesn't appeal to most people. Let's accept that reality.
 
if that was put into practice, over 90% of the dives made wouldn't happen. While I love the quality of GUE training and recommend it ad nauseum, team based diving doesn't appeal to most people. Let's accept that reality.
I agree. Regardless of whether or not it would appeal to most people, you also have to acknowledge that many divers don't have a reliable buddy to dive with all the time. When I travel, I don't have a buddy to dive with. My options for deeper dives are to carry a pony, hire a private guide (not always an option), to hope that an instabuddy is a great buddy, or not dive. For me, carrying a pony is the best of these options.
 
I'm persuaded that for the most common flavors of rec diving there is usually a better alternative than a pony, but I'm not going to attempt to persuade anyone else. Go on, sling that thing! :)

As a newish rec diver without someone to dive with when I travel, I'm honesty curious what the better alternative is for me than using a pony for deeper rec dives? I'm not a pony zealot, just someone who's tried to think logically about the problem and a 19 cuft pony seems to be the best solution (I did the math about my estimated air usage in case of an emergency and 19 cuft worked - just as it did for @scubadada )
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom