Green_Manelishi
Contributor
I find myself agreeing with the "simpler is best" philosophy.
Although I do not own one (yet?) I rather like the idea of
a reel that can be dis-assembled to some degree under-
water: that perhaps makes it easier to clear a jam.
Otherwise, I'd say that any mechanism designed to *prevent*
a jam will soooner or later fail and then what are you going to
do?
FWIW: I currently own two reels, an OMS (simple) and a
ReefSCUBA (simple, no anti-jam, not a "seal reel"). I bought
the reefscuba on special. It was explained to me that the
reels were being sold out at a special price because most
folks want "anti-jam" and tensioning mechanisms.
I think you will find (at least I found) that if the line is too thick
to pass between the spool and the body of the reel it is less
likely to jam. I am therefore replacing the #36 on my OMS
with #48 (like that on my reefscuba)
Although I do not own one (yet?) I rather like the idea of
a reel that can be dis-assembled to some degree under-
water: that perhaps makes it easier to clear a jam.
Otherwise, I'd say that any mechanism designed to *prevent*
a jam will soooner or later fail and then what are you going to
do?
FWIW: I currently own two reels, an OMS (simple) and a
ReefSCUBA (simple, no anti-jam, not a "seal reel"). I bought
the reefscuba on special. It was explained to me that the
reels were being sold out at a special price because most
folks want "anti-jam" and tensioning mechanisms.
I think you will find (at least I found) that if the line is too thick
to pass between the spool and the body of the reel it is less
likely to jam. I am therefore replacing the #36 on my OMS
with #48 (like that on my reefscuba)