MudDog:
JS1scuba...I appreciate your sharing your insight here, but I am a little confused by what you mean by "lighter than PST". Are you comparing to the old PST LPs?
--------
8 inch to 8 inch Worthington 108 to the PST E-8 there is about a 1-2 lbs difference. I dont have the specs in front of me.
cheers
jds
If I understand you correctly, are you comparing just the external dimensions? In other words, and 8" diameter 26" tall PST to a simlar Worthington?
If so that would be a PST E8-130 to a Worthington LP108
E8-130: 8" diam 26.12" H
LP108: 8" diam 26.5" H
E8-130: 43# empty
108: 42# empty
E8-130: 130 cuft gas at max fill
LP108: (according to "Jason B"'s prior post...at max fill ("overfill") 2640) 108cuft gas
If exterior dimensions are the sole criteria, then yes the Worthingtons are a pound lighter. But then their swing weight offsets this:
LP108s: -8 to neutral
E8130s: -10.5 to -1
...bkz in theory you would need the extra pound to offset the Worthington's neutral buoyancy.
So yes, again in terms of exterior dimensions about the same...but I was more concerned about comparing cylinders with like gas capacity. In this comparison, PST at max fill has an additional 22cuft gas (130 VS 108).
Best regards,
Jeff