World's first full-face snorkel-mask standard reaches approval stage

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

David Wilson

Contributor
Messages
3,273
Reaction score
4,339
Location
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
The British Standards Institution has been developing a national standard for full-face snorkel-masks. The original proposal dates from October-November 2022 and the project has now reached the approval stage, with just publication to follow. The British Standard will be entitled "BS 8647:2024 Respiratory equipment – Full-face snorkel masks – Specification and test method". Details at BS 8647:2024 Respiratory equipment – Full-face snorkel masks – Specification and test method.

If I had known about this BSI project a year and a half ago, I would have contributed several suggestions for inclusion in the final text. One would have been that half-face snorkel-masks should have been included in the remit. This from the October/November 2022 proposal:

Scope. This British Standard specifies safety requirements in order to increase safety in the use of full-face snorkel masks (FFSM) for swimmers. This British Standard is applicable to full face snorkel masks, which allow the user to breathe at the water surface while floating with the face submerged. It covers full face snorkel masks used by swimmers.

Purpose. These products are being used in the leisure industry however serious accidents have occurred some resulting in fatalities. There is no standard or guidance for the manufacture of these products and cheap, sub-standard product is on the market. This standard will provide the benchmark safety standard for this equipment which will be taken into account by manufacturers in the design and production of the equipment and by consumers and users when deciding on the purchase of equipment. The production of equipment that meets the proposed standard will enhance user confidence.
 
Hi "David Wilson"
Standards are certainly a good idea, but users should be aware that safety training is more important, as I have suggested here : How to make a fullface snorkelmask safe by Achim Schlöffel message #10 and you gave me a 👍 Thanks 😃
As I wrote in a message preceding yours on that same thread : "There is no substitute for proper training and practice in the use of ANY item of underwater gear after its purchase". In the wrong hands, without supervision or prior training, even an ordinary half-face dive mask can be a contributory factor in a fatal accident:

upload_2021-9-23_9-36-44-jpeg.683481

It is easy to demonise one piece of diving gear when it ends up in the hands of vulnerable people who do not know how to handle it properly. The article above appeared in the September 1974 issue of the British Sub-Aqua Club magazine "Triton". The "dodgy masks" mentioned in the title were not combined snorkel-masks at all, but basic swim-masks whose misuse tragically contributed to one young person's death. I am sure we can agree that ANY item of underwater equipment can be dangerous, particularly when improperly used by an unsupervised non-swimmer of tender years.

upload_2021-9-23_10-14-4-jpeg.683483

As for those old-school snorkel-masks whose heyday was the 1950s, let us not forget that they were first developed to serve the adult underwater hunting community (see above). Back then, stand-alone snorkels sometimes came with rough mouthpiece flanges that rubbed the gums raw after many hours lying prone on the surface stalking prey; or the constant oral presence of a mouthpiece eventually triggered a gagging reflex. So snorkel-masks covering the eyes and the nose only were designed to allow nose breathing instead. Several full-face snorkel-masks were also available then, covering the mouth too, enabling mouth breathing, but they came with special chin-pieces and were fewer in number. The common factor was their price, out of reach to most parents buying for their children, but still affordable by jet-setting international spearfishing tourists with deep pockets and plenty of experience. Sadly, certain manufacturers later began making cheaper snorkel-masks for young people without providing even minimal safety instructions, which inevitably led to often fatal accidents, just as would have happened if, say, self-contained underwater breathing apparatus had ever come on open sale to young non-swimmers. There is no substitute for proper training and practice in the use of ANY item of underwater gear after its purchase.
 

Back
Top Bottom