To a man, as no woman was bent, they all admitted to making miscalculations which resulted in them being bent. All of them felt that we shouldn't hold Ratio Deco liable as this was 'their' fault. The human factor is the weak link here. Deny it all you want, but while PDCs fail every so often, the human brain fails multiple times a day. It's great at nuance but sucks for data integrity and retrieval. Task loading and depth aggravate this to the point that it's my belief that friends don't let friends dive Ratio Deco. I'm certainly not going to. There is simply no real tangible benefit to be derived from it.I propose it's reasonable to assume that factors hadn't been isolated in such a sample.