Interesting. I have always thought that I was getting hits in the same places, and figured it was due to scar tissue. But during the last year I heard a doctor from DAN tell me, when I asked him that same question, that the odds really aren't in favor of getting a hit in the same place twice, and that there wasn't a correlation between location of scar tissue and location of the hit. Actually, he says that one of the first screening questions they ask at DAN, when you call in, is where the supposed hit is and had you ever had a hit there before. If you answered it's the same place as before they usually remove you from the suspect hit list.
:huh: Really?!??! Based on that one answer??? I don't get it - seems awfully caviler.