which
- Thread starter bvanant
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
WS007
Contributor
Thank you - the first comparison I see with and without MFO-1...
What lens was used?
The difference is subtile, but I think the "top" image shows more detail and is sharper when compared to "bottom"...
Wolfgang
What lens was used?
The difference is subtile, but I think the "top" image shows more detail and is sharper when compared to "bottom"...
Wolfgang
I agree with Wolfgang. It is very subtle, but the photo labeled “Top” seems a bit sharper. Also a bit brighter, which I don’t know enough to know if that can be a function of the lens. All that being said, it took me a couple of minutes of going back and forth before deciding.
Erik
Erik
Anbaric Cog
Registered
I agree very subtle. To me the foreground looks sharper in the “top” image. The NB looks the same to me. Could be dry eyes or just envy
Thank you for sharing
Thank you for sharing
Ardy
Contributor
- Messages
- 1,319
- Reaction score
- 198
- Location
- Australia - Southern HIghlands NSW
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
Bill, Another vote for top image, as it lifts the high colour of the top and still does a good job on the rest of it.
Would the snoot have done a better job?
Would the snoot have done a better job?
OP
bvanant
Contributor
I could have snooted it but I am trying to show the corners/edges using the MFO, that is where it is supposed to help
Bill
Bill
Similar threads
