https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ne...41-melting-icebergs-boost-sea-level-rise/amp/
“When an ice cube melts in a glass, the overall water level does not change from when the ice is frozen to when it joins the liquid. Doesn’t that mean that melting icebergs shouldn’t contribute to sea-level rise? Not quite.
Although most of the
contributions to sea-level rise come from
water and ice moving from land into the ocean, it turns out that the melting of floating ice causes a small amount of sea-level rise, too.
Globally, it doesn’t sound like much – just 0.049 millimetres per year – but if all the sea ice currently bobbing on the oceans were to melt, it could raise sea level by 4 to 6 centimetres.
Fresh water, of which icebergs are made, is less dense than salty sea water. So while the amount of sea water displaced by the iceberg is equal to its weight, the melted fresh water will take up a slightly larger volume than the displaced salt water. This results in a small increase in the water level.
Diluted oceans
Andrew Shepherd and colleagues from the University of Leeds, UK, used iceberg surveys to analyse the amount of ice floating on the world’s oceans. Taking into account melting ice shelves, melting
Arctic sea ice, and the increase of Antarctic sea ice – which removes water from the oceans – they estimate that about 746 cubic kilometres of ice are melting each year, overall.
“The ice melting is diluting the oceans, decreasing its density and raising sea levels as a consequence,” says Shepherd.
The team calculate that the melting of floating ice accounts for a small amount of the 0.3 millimetres per year unaccounted for in the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s best model of sea-level rise, currently measured at about 3.1 millimetres per year.
David Holland of New York University’s Center for Atmosphere Ocean Science says the work is a useful contribution to understanding the details of sea-level rise. “Global sea-level change from floating ice is small, but perhaps in a regional sense detectable,” he says.
Journal reference:
Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: 10.1029/2010GL042496 (in press)”