exactly.... why give the main event away for free!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
gj62:A few other notes: If you fail to enforce your patent, you can lose it. A common method is to file suit, thereby going on record, as soon as you know of an infringement.
gj62:Sorry - you're right - they are only public after 18 months, not immediately. At that time, the public can request a copy of the application file. This gives a 6-month lead time, as the usual wait is 24 months (and getting longer).
scubasean:I disagree with you. Please cite examples or court cases.
It is trademarks, not patents that must be policed. A patent is enforceable even if you wait until ten or fifteen years after industry acceptance to file suit.
nyresq:to violate the patent, does it have to violate all the specs? or any?
one spec in the patent states
"A lamp assembly according to claim 1, wherein:
said coupling means is a cable with a wet pluggable plug at one end for coupling/uncoupling to/from a battery pack while under water. "
so does that mean if your light is hard wired to the canister its not in violation of this patent?
or does it mean ANY light with a wet plug on the canister is in violation of patent infringment?
does it have to copy a certain percentage of the specs?
any lawyers please jump in on this question.
no thats a dependent claim, adding to the novelty in the event if claim 1 is considered to broad..nyresq:so then it would seem to me if the light didn't have a wet plug, then it would fall outside of the patent? or am I missing something. I have seen alot of HID lights that are hard wired between the can and the head.