- Messages
- 63,269
- Reaction score
- 16,549
well, okay. I see that they do not seem to mind endangering the greenpeace activists.
You continue to only choose points you can "win". I still cannot comprehend why the same person upset about coral grafitti would defend whaling in any way. But, Kim, I just don't think we are on the same wavelength here. You originally cried racism and it got my back up. I just don't see it...
I very much like the Marine Biologist's post about the numbers game vs the immeasurable loss sustained by continuing this practice. He articulated my position better than I can. I just do not see any recognition from you that you see that we are factoring in concepts here that you fail to even recognize. Very similiar to you not understanding "I am sorry you see me as condescending". That is not really an apology (not that you owe me one!) But it's essential essence is profoundly different from "I am sorry I was condescending". When I apologized I said " I am sorry I was rude" That means something different from "Kim, I am sorry that you see me as rude. I still do not understand what name you say I called you. "A bad example"? Then, you are very sensitive to be in this passionate debate, of which you and Andy seem to have no real feelings about. Just a desire to "out-fact" someone else. Only sensitive when it comes to your wife's ethnicity or a perception that you were called a name. But no sensitivity for the whales or us "other people".
PS So, can I run protesters or the press over with my car? Just because they are interfering with me? No, it would be manslaughter at the very least in my way of thinking. Hey, maybe I am wrong and if so I stand corrected I guess.
You continue to only choose points you can "win". I still cannot comprehend why the same person upset about coral grafitti would defend whaling in any way. But, Kim, I just don't think we are on the same wavelength here. You originally cried racism and it got my back up. I just don't see it...
I very much like the Marine Biologist's post about the numbers game vs the immeasurable loss sustained by continuing this practice. He articulated my position better than I can. I just do not see any recognition from you that you see that we are factoring in concepts here that you fail to even recognize. Very similiar to you not understanding "I am sorry you see me as condescending". That is not really an apology (not that you owe me one!) But it's essential essence is profoundly different from "I am sorry I was condescending". When I apologized I said " I am sorry I was rude" That means something different from "Kim, I am sorry that you see me as rude. I still do not understand what name you say I called you. "A bad example"? Then, you are very sensitive to be in this passionate debate, of which you and Andy seem to have no real feelings about. Just a desire to "out-fact" someone else. Only sensitive when it comes to your wife's ethnicity or a perception that you were called a name. But no sensitivity for the whales or us "other people".
PS So, can I run protesters or the press over with my car? Just because they are interfering with me? No, it would be manslaughter at the very least in my way of thinking. Hey, maybe I am wrong and if so I stand corrected I guess.