Takes longer for who, some people have very low oxygen tolerance, you have to test equipment for the weakest userHonestly a tox takes longer that losing all the gas out of a twinset. CCR’s main win is time.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Takes longer for who, some people have very low oxygen tolerance, you have to test equipment for the weakest userHonestly a tox takes longer that losing all the gas out of a twinset. CCR’s main win is time.
Where did that figure come fromtoxing doesn't happen the second you go above 1.6
The autopsy said oxygen spike we’re not talking about PO2 of 1.6, and we’re not talking about a novice. He was highly trained and experienced diver. A professional and part of the Garda water unit. Anyone that thinks he didn’t notice an alarm or ignored an alarm is living in fantasy land.1.6? The maximum generally accepted safe PO2 limit?
Rebreathers are dangerous and that is a fact that was well known to the man that died. There’s only one explanation for what happened, the equipment malfunctioned and for whatever reason he didn’t get to use his bailout.You're trying to fit this accident into a neat box that can simply be handwaved away as rebreathers being dangerous. It shows a lack of understanding of rebreathers and human factors on your part.
Rebreathers are dangerous and that is a fact that was well known to the man that died. There’s only one explanation for what happened, the equipment malfunctioned and for whatever reason he didn’t get to use his bailout.
what is very low? The 1.6 number is basically made up. Various navies used to run higher ppo2 and very few tox events happen lower. The Shearwater controller will alarm at a user specified ppo2. If you think you will not immediately at 1.6 set it to alarm at 1.4 and run a set point of 1.1, lots of people run 1.2 rather than the default 1.3Takes longer for who, some people have very low oxygen tolerance, you have to test equipment for the weakest user
I guess you have evidence we don't...Rebreathers are dangerous and that is a fact that was well known to the man that died. There’s only one explanation for what happened, the equipment malfunctioned and for whatever reason he didn’t get to use his bailout.
Whether he was aware of the malfunction or not, it’s still a malfunction. How can you then say it was a user error. Just because someone fails to bailout doesn’t make the reason for the bailout their fault.You're leaving out the very real and even likely possibility that he made a mistake that prevented him from using his bailout. As has been explained to you multiple times, high PO2 doesn't instantly kill and he was likely aware or capable of being aware of the malfunction based on what we know. Why that's so hard to accept, I don't understand.