Crazy Fingers
Contributor
Since I love to rile you people up, I'm gonna throw you something else to chew on. Me and one of my local gas suppliers had a discussion about this earlier today and came to agreement.
Yearly visual inspection of modern aluminum cylinders is stupid, and yet another dive industry scam to make money. In an aluminum cylinder which does not oxidize beyond a monolayer, "rust" isn't really a concern. I think it's left over from the days when every tank was steel and interior rust could theoretically cause corrosion from the inside and failure of the cylinder. Once the industry moved over (mostly) to aluminum tanks, why stop the requirement if it gets you $15-20 per tank per year?
But the conspiracy gets worse... valving and devalving an aluminum cylinder only puts needless wear and tear on the threads, which might cause it to fail inspection, or worse. The process therefore costs a diver more money, wears his cylinders out faster, and is quite possibly more unsafe than simply hydrostating every 5 years and having no visual.
Yearly visual inspection of modern aluminum cylinders is stupid, and yet another dive industry scam to make money. In an aluminum cylinder which does not oxidize beyond a monolayer, "rust" isn't really a concern. I think it's left over from the days when every tank was steel and interior rust could theoretically cause corrosion from the inside and failure of the cylinder. Once the industry moved over (mostly) to aluminum tanks, why stop the requirement if it gets you $15-20 per tank per year?
But the conspiracy gets worse... valving and devalving an aluminum cylinder only puts needless wear and tear on the threads, which might cause it to fail inspection, or worse. The process therefore costs a diver more money, wears his cylinders out faster, and is quite possibly more unsafe than simply hydrostating every 5 years and having no visual.