Randy43068
Guest
- Messages
- 5,461
- Reaction score
- 135
- # of dives
- 100 - 199
I seriously doubt that will be at play on a typical set of rec dives.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Technically, your buddy was right. You air hogs were going thru your 80s fast enough that air would have kept your computer happy enough. I do, too - so I make sure that the boat will furnish me 100 cf Nitrox tanks.I recently spent a week on a liveaboard diving Nitrox 32. My buddy dove Air. Our dive profiles were essentially the same. We discussed this at length and after spending $150.00 on Nitrox I found myself a little argumentative, however the more I thought about what he was saying the more I started to agree. Here is the position he took.
At no time did he ever reach nitrogen levels that would put him in the yellow and his point is, until your air consumption is so refined that you are staying down for extended times, the nitrox really doesn't benefit you. We were diving at depths of 90+ and we logged 4 to 5 dives every day. We always had a minimum of 80 minutes of surface time between dives. Although we did not spend a lot of time at depth, we generally started our dives deeper on the wall and worked our way back up. Dive times of 40 to 45 minutes with 500 psi at surface
My position was, a lower nitrogen level, regardless of what it is, would be a positive thing.
Just looking for some feedback that can support either position.
Bruce
Nope, think you got that wrong.Well if memory serves me correctly 90+ feet is not the optimum range for EANx... now if you where on a liveaboard and diving 4 or 5 dives a day in the 40 to 80 foot range you will than see the benefits of diving EANx... you could get all your dives in for the day diving EANx where someone diving regular air may or may not.

Want to show me a peer reviewed article that indicates that nitrogen load is not a risk factor for DCS?
f your dive buddy has to end the dive because of time constraints, under the buddy system you are ending your dive as well.
Which book is that? Can you print an exerpt? (Yes, I know that it's yours!) And how much more energy is that exactly? How do you quantify? A cup of coffee gives me a lift but unlike you, I can actually justify that.
I'm sure that you mean the "perception" of extra energy. I have yet to see a peer reviewed article or study showing increased "energy" as a result of using Nitrox. I've been diving air, nitrox and other mixes for years. I've yet to experience a difference in energy level as a result of the mix. If we dived nitrous perhaps...!![]()
Hey, I didn't mean that badly. I'm still a hog, always will be. So I avoid Ops who cannot supply me with 100 cf tanks.Until our air consumption decreases (as Dandy Don would say, no longer air hogs), what is the value of EAN?

IIRC every single study done has found absolutely no statistically significant decrease in incidences of DCS when diving air vs diving nitrox on air tables. People have tried and failed to find a correlation.
diving at depths of 90+ and we logged 4 to 5 dives every day.
We always had a minimum of 80 minutes of surface time between dives.
We generally started our dives deeper on the wall and worked our way back up.
Dive times of 40 to 45