Phillip T Mcdonald
Registered
What company made the divers communications sets for voice to the bottom of sea the TV series
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
The showNice typo. It was Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, and ran 1964-1068 on TV, and was a 1961 movie.
Which are you referring to?
Added: there was no diver-to-diver wireless communication system in the early 60's.
It was a science-fiction show. Not everything in it was true.
I don't know, but when I saw the title of this thread I was hoping it related to the general topic. When I got certified back in the mid-70's there was this whoopie cushion like bag thing that you inflated, and then spoke into underwater. You could hear the speaker's voice astonishingly well. I've never seen one sinc
Yep, reminds me of how, also back in the mid-70's, my buddy and I would sometimes take off a glove, exhale air into it (while rolled upside down) and then talk. The sound quality was surprisingly good with a little practice, though on the whole it was more of a novelty thing than a practical means of communication.I don't know, but when I saw the title of this thread I was hoping it related to the general topic. When I got certified back in the mid-70's there was this whoopie cushion like bag thing that you inflated, and then spoke into underwater. You could hear the speaker's voice astonishingly well. I've never seen one since.
Yes, that sort of thing exactly. I'd think a very thin membrane, like a latex or nitrile glove, would work the best. I may try that next time we're in the water!Yep, reminds me of how, also back in the mid-70's, my buddy and I would sometimes take off a glove, exhale air into it (while rolled upside down) and then talk. The sound quality was surprisingly good with a little practice, though on the whole it was more of a novelty thing than a practical means of communication.