Two Naive Flash Questions

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Just a further comment. There is a tremendous confusion in many articles about the distances at which sharks can detect "vibrations" and whether these are mechanical or electromagnetic/electrostatic.

Often this confusion comes about because many mechanical vibrators are described as "electronic".
Example:
http://www.blueoceantackle.com/fish_magnet_info.htm
This site talks about "electronic fishing lures" whereas the operational description is very clear:
"These unique devices use specific pressure (vibrations) to emulate struggling bait fish" and
"It is now emitting a rich tone, while acoustically vibrating the water in a 360 degree pattern. You are now being heard a minimum of a 1 mile under water."

What is attracting the shark at a distance are mechanical/acoustic vibrations. It is most unlikely this device would be detectable electromagnetically at 1 mile distance.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom