WarmWaterDiver
Contributor
Our ANDI training used RMV, not SAC, and we were taught to use rule of thirds for enough gas for both divers.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Charlie99:Actually there IS one assumption that rule of thirds makes. It assumes that the remaining 2/3 gas is enough for both divers to make it back to the exit point. That assumes that the combined SAC of the two divers under what could be a stressful situation will not be more than 2 x the normal SAC of the higher SAC diver.
Rule of thirds isn't all that conservative, particularly when you consider that incidents tend to happen at transition points, and turning the dive is a transition point.
So how does ANDI define RMV?WarmWaterDiver:Our ANDI training used RMV, not SAC, and we were taught to use rule of thirds for enough gas for both divers.
I agree with all of the above. I just threw out my comment because I've seen many posts that sound like the poster thinks rule of thirds is really conservative. It isn't if you are using it in a case where you really do need to make it back to an exit point. There definitely is no allowace for increased SAC like there is in rock bottom calculations.theskull:True, but with some buffer as well. If a cave dive, a majority of the time you will be exiting with the flow having swam in against it, and therefore have an additional margin of error. If open water, you most often will have descended, swam around a little, and if you must now share air you can make a direct ascent--getting to the surface being more important than returning over exact route or getting back to the descent line. Also, in both cases you are done sight-seeing and are focused on the task of exiting/ascending without dawdling.
That said, thirds is still the limit--not the goal. There is no penalty for ending the dive with more than the planned amount of breathing gas!
True and also keep in mind that when calculating our thirds, we did a crap load of rounding down which also puts more gas in our tanks that we don't have included in our plan.theskull:True, but with some buffer as well. If a cave dive, a majority of the time you will be exiting with the flow having swam in against it, and therefore have an additional margin of error. If open water, you most often will have descended, swam around a little, and if you must now share air you can make a direct ascent--getting to the surface being more important than returning over exact route or getting back to the descent line. Also, in both cases you are done sight-seeing and are focused on the task of exiting/ascending without dawdling.
That said, thirds is still the limit--not the goal. There is no penalty for ending the dive with more than the planned amount of breathing gas!
theskull
wedivebc:After wading through 20 pages of posts unrelated to this topic I thought I would ask:
When I was taught technical diving I was taught turn pressure based on buddy's air consumption, tank volume, volume matching. When I took my cave training we were taught a much simpler method using only buddy with least volume controlled turn pressure regardless of SAC rate. It actually made sense.
I was wondering what agency taught what procedure. Anyone care to comment?
wedivebc:So how does ANDI define RMV?
OneBrightGator:Alright... 2650 rounds down to 2600, which is not divisable by 3, so it goes to 2400, divided by 3 is 800 PSI, if the tanks hold 170 cu. ft. @ 2640 (2640/170=15.5) then 800 PSI equals 51 cu. ft. which is the amount of usuable gas.
3442/238=14.5, 14.5x51=740, rounds to 700 PSI.