Why should the whale (porpoise really) pay for the people's mistakes? It didn't ask to be captured or bred in captivity or treated as a show animal. It can't be released now, I'm sure, but it could be treated with enough respect that no one else gets killed.
I'm not necessarily opposed to keeping animals in captivity. It can serve a purpose and I haven't been to Sea World in 30 years so I don't know if they "do it right" or not. But I do know that when a captive wild animal does what comes naturally and "attacks" a human, it is not the animal's fault.
I could not agree more!
There are "humans" in captivity who have killed more than this mammal has, who will be coddled to perpetuity. Why should this magnificent specimen (hey, they were keeping him for reproduction!) be dispatched because it was exhibiting its natural tendencies?

Don't get me wrong, I feel, immensely, for the trainer and her family. There is no question that a tragedy occurred today; but do you treat the "murderer" in this case any differently than we treat mass murderers in the balance of this country? Sea World created this circumstance for its own business purposes. Why punish an innocent creature?
