Russjstewart
Contributor
I
I suspect the British, French and Pakistan governments will also do something, even if it is a coroners inquest.
The following has more information
U.S. Coast Guard Declares Titan Loss a 'Major Marine Casualty' and contains links to lawyers already posting about the incident
Where was the Titan manufactured, according to hklaw.com
U.S. regulations also require that vessels built in the United States or operating in U.S. waters be certificated by the USCG to meet applicable requirements for safety at sea, as well as other regulations established pursuant to law
Call me a cynic, but this is a very high profile incident and does involve the death of a U.S. citizen. A possible result of the investigation might simply to be to verify that US agencies had no control of the vessel and therefore icannot be blamed for lack of enforcementHuh.
It’s a bit of a surprise to me. It may be a US company, but operating from a Canadian flagged vessel, from a Canadian port, in international waters.
The US Coast Guard can investigate, but the findings are useless.
I suspect the British, French and Pakistan governments will also do something, even if it is a coroners inquest.
The following has more information
U.S. Coast Guard Declares Titan Loss a 'Major Marine Casualty' and contains links to lawyers already posting about the incident
The Solemn Role of the Coast Guard and NTSB in Casualties Involving Passenger-Carrying Submersibles | Insights | Holland & Knight
The tragic loss of the submersible vessel Titan has garnered international attention and raised questions as to the role of the U.S. in oversight of tourism submersibles.
www.hklaw.com
Where was the Titan manufactured, according to hklaw.com
U.S. regulations also require that vessels built in the United States or operating in U.S. waters be certificated by the USCG to meet applicable requirements for safety at sea, as well as other regulations established pursuant to law