Conserving sharks is an entirely reasonably policy goal, and the role of sharks as an important part of marine ecosystems is well documented. However, by targeting a specific (primarily Asian) cultural practice as "the worst thing to ever happen to sharks", while neglecting the apocalyptic effects of largely Western-driven anthropogenic ocean acidification and climate change on these same ecosystems, Westerners are again demonstrating that cultural imperialism runs deep and strong. Western policies and practices caused the near extinction of Atlantic cod and salmon (and their related ecosystems), the collapse of orange roughy, the ongoing collapse of the (delicious) salmon of western North America, and so on.
No one ever said Westerner’s are perfect. There are some real efforts being made to regulate the taking of other fish stocks but I’ve chosen to focus on the plight of the shark. Being the apex predator, if they disappear, the other regulations will soon after be moot.
It's sort of difficult for me--having built my career in marine conservation--to take this sudden interest in "oh, no, dead sharks!" seriously, ..
I’m happy to say that you share a point view that only a small number of other marine conservationists share. Your statement makes me think of the RJ Reynolds president when appearing before a Senate Committee saying, ”Mr. Congressman, cigarettes and nicotine clearly do not meet the classic definition of addiction.”
I’ll give your comments the same weight of creditability.