bintang_shrimp
Registered
I now found the link that made me question the lens utility of M3 and higher:
Sony RX100 Mark III – Is it worth upgrading?
Seems like pretty bad macro performance, even with diopters. Not image quality but the working distance and magnification.
As far as high-ISO, anyone can visit my original link to PDReview, I think up to ISO 800 at least the models after II all seem almost equal. Nobody really uses ISO over 400 - 800 under water, and then mostly of deep natural light, like wrecks. At that point diving conditions are the limiting factor.
On top of that having to pay for new housings to upgrade is just killer. I use cheap Meikons and can't imagine how some people readily swap cameras every model and then hand Nauticam a blank check to their bank account
Sony RX100 Mark III – Is it worth upgrading?
Seems like pretty bad macro performance, even with diopters. Not image quality but the working distance and magnification.
As far as high-ISO, anyone can visit my original link to PDReview, I think up to ISO 800 at least the models after II all seem almost equal. Nobody really uses ISO over 400 - 800 under water, and then mostly of deep natural light, like wrecks. At that point diving conditions are the limiting factor.
On top of that having to pay for new housings to upgrade is just killer. I use cheap Meikons and can't imagine how some people readily swap cameras every model and then hand Nauticam a blank check to their bank account
