The Elusive Definition of "Deep Stops"

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

boulderjohn

Technical Instructor
Scuba Instructor
Divemaster
Messages
32,584
Reaction score
31,874
Location
Boulder, CO
# of dives
1000 - 2499
In this thread, some people have lamented the fact that people are arguing over deep stops without a clear definition of what we are talking about. I fully agree. I am a technical instructor teaching a curriculum that includes an extensive section on deep stops, and I am not confident that I can give a definition that will not be disputed by people with different definitions. I think the biggest reason we have a problem is that the definition has evolved over time. I myself became part of the discussion fairly late in that evolution, so my understanding of some of it might be off. What I hope to do here is write an introduction describing that evolution as I see it so that others can step in and offer insights and possibly corrections so that we all have a better understanding of it all.

My first real introduction to it was many years ago, during a ScubaBoard thread in which someone asked about deep stops. A poster replied that they were invented by DR. Richard Pyle and were called "Pyle Stops." The next post started with something like, "Actually, I didn't invent them." Well, that became an interesting thread. I read some of the stuff Pyle wrote about them and then I read other stuff as well. At that point, I got the idea that a deep stop was a stop taken at half your maximum depth, which I understood to be much deeper than technical divers usually made their first stops. I was not a technical diver then, but I began to apply it my recreational diving, doing a stop at half my maximum depth rather than going up to the standard safety stop.

In my early technical training, we were not allowed to use computers or any of the desktop computing programs (like V-Planner, Decoplanner, etc.). We had to use a mathematical construct based on our average maximum depth. It stressed the importance of deep stops, which started at 3/4 of that average maximum depth--MUCH deeper than my old idea of half the maximum depth. I did many dives using that philosophy.

I became aware of the deep stop discussion hosted by DAN, and I wondered what they were calling a deep stop. The best I could figure out was they were calling a deep stop an added stop taken much deeper than the algorithm you are using called for. I found that definition was actually pretty common--a deep stop was something you added to the dive profile that was defined by whatever system you were otherwise using. That's pretty vague. Since the algorithm I was using called for me to do my first stop at 3/4 of my maximum depth, adding a stop deeper than that would be pretty darn deep. I was baffled, to be honest.

I think that definition shows the evolutionary aspect of this, because it came into existence before the creation of some of the programs in place today that already include deep stops in their algorithms. Some programs have algorithms that are based on the thinking of deep stop theorists, and they will definitely stop you much deeper than others. If you add an additional deeper stop to them, you are doing something not intended by the original deep stop theorists.

So, that is my stumbling attempt to help define the idea, and I hope others will refine and correct.
 
Hi Boulderjohn,
great idea starting this thread.
My personal take on this is that a deep stop is anything done before any of the compartments reach its M value.
Which means a dissolved gas algjoritm would not mandate a stop a that point.
Now the use of ZHL-L16-GF obviously will mud the waters bacause GF Low might be mandating a stop well before reaching the M value for any of the compartments. That is precisely why I would define the deep stop the way I did.

Also this might be insufficient to achieve the benefits purported by Dr. Pyle (and I am sure felt by many tech divers stopping on the way to ceiling)

Looking forward to discussion in this thread.

Cheers
 
My personal take on this is that a deep stop is anything done before any of the compartments reach its M value.
So how do you calculate when to take a deep stop?
 
I'm afraid you have muddied the waters by introducing ratio deco, which itself is fundamentally voodoo. Please define "average maximum depth." :)

The only useful definition of deep stops is what you originally stated: a stop that is in mid-depth somewhere, and NOT part of your cut-tables or computer deco profile. That it is half the max depth, or half the max pressure, is irrelevant; it is a stop inserted arbitrarily and causes additional on-gassing; if using cut-tables, you may or may not have compensated for it. If using a computer, it knows what you did and tries to compensate. All those long threads say is that the (arbitrarily added) deep stop adds to the time it takes to get out of the water.

I submit that a stop that happens to be deep because that is the bubble model or GF you chose is not a deep stop....it is just part of the algorithm. Clever people trying to force clever programs to produce stops that are deep because they somehow think that starting one's stops deeper is a good thing to do, need to show that it is a good thing to do. No one seems to have done that except to show that all shallow stops is not so good, but that does not imply one has to start from half the depth.
 
I said in the other thread (lost in the sea of messages): I run my plan in VPM +2 and adjust my GF low in order to get an initial stop around there. Also I check my offgass depth and avoid stopping much below that.
It usually comes between half and 2/3 of max dept ... 60 meters for 30-35 minutes comes up to 39 meters (if my memory serves me right) and I usually switch from 18/50 to 35/30 if I am diving 3 stages.
 
I'm afraid you have muddied the waters by introducing ratio deco, which itself is fundamentally voodoo.

There's nothing voodoo about ratio deco. The whole point is to literally give you the same deco schedule as your algorithm of choice.
 
There's nothing voodoo about ratio deco. The whole point is to literally give you the same deco schedule as your algorithm of choice.
Please define "average maximum depth." :)
 
I'm assuming he mis-wrote that. My use and introduction to ratio deco (GUE/UTD) only referenced "average depth".
Yes, that's what I meant.
 
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom