I recently built a doubles rig with Luxfer Neutrally Buoyant AL80s. They trim out nicely for me and I have no problem getting full 3300 psi fills.
Here's the issue: I'm used to using "5" as a tank factor when dealing with doubled AL80s, but recently realized that this factor might not be accurate in re: the neutrally buoyant cylinders, which have a true capacity (77.4) identical to that of a standard AL80, but a higher service pressure (3300).
__________________________
Capacity / Service Pressure = Tank Factor
AL80
77.4 / 3000 = 0.0258
2.6 x 2 = 5.2
ALN80
77.4 / 3300 = 0.0234
2.3 x 2 = 4.6
__________________________
That strikes me as a pretty wide swing (.6 cu ft per 100 psi) for cylinders with identical capacity ratings, even with a 300 psi difference in service pressure.
Have I calculated this correctly?
Is there enough "fudge factor" built in or should I use 4.5 as a tank factor?
Thank you.
Here's the issue: I'm used to using "5" as a tank factor when dealing with doubled AL80s, but recently realized that this factor might not be accurate in re: the neutrally buoyant cylinders, which have a true capacity (77.4) identical to that of a standard AL80, but a higher service pressure (3300).
__________________________
Capacity / Service Pressure = Tank Factor
AL80
77.4 / 3000 = 0.0258
2.6 x 2 = 5.2
ALN80
77.4 / 3300 = 0.0234
2.3 x 2 = 4.6
__________________________
That strikes me as a pretty wide swing (.6 cu ft per 100 psi) for cylinders with identical capacity ratings, even with a 300 psi difference in service pressure.
Have I calculated this correctly?
Is there enough "fudge factor" built in or should I use 4.5 as a tank factor?
Thank you.