So, relative UW photography beginner here. Sony A6300 on order. SeaFrogs housing will be next... I think.... But there is something I essentially still do not understand and hope you can help me with ... and part of it is relevant for the housing selection ... Nothing absolutely mission critical I hope, but I'd like to understand...:
If one wants to switch between ambient light pictures and flash lit pictures on the same dive, would one not need a wet, removable red filter (off for flash, on for ambient) (at least with a camera like any Sony that does not have enough white balance correction "breath" for UW)?
If so, is then the standard (no filter thread) flat port that comes with the SeaFrogs A6xxx housing useless for that? Or how does one get a removable wet filter on that?
Options?
Expanding the thought:
If I were to play with a fisheye lens (Samyang f 8mm f2.8) under the 4"dome port (focus preset, aperture preset)... I also would have no option for a filter... But that sort of setup seems predestined more for available light than flash... Or do people flash that wide...?
If wanting to go available light are there any (thin) options for a filter between lens and camera housing (yes I could loose infinity focus (except stopped fown with fepth of field)... just wondering, is there such a thing as a thin e-mount to e-mount lens adapter that takes filters?
Other Options?
Also, I presently still stink at my photo editing-fu. That free Dive+ editors with the annoying unremovable (unless cropped) Dive + logo runs circles around me. Trying to understand if the following is or is not the case:
Ambient light:
So if the camera w/o filter cannot adjust a (manual) whitebalance correctly because of lack of adjustment range... but a filter helps with that... does that mean that if one was a better photo editor that one could tweak in a picture taken at some depth, (say 27m 90 feet-ish for the argument) in RAW, without filter to look like one taken with (red) filter? ... Or not really?
(and flash and close distance is not only the better, but the only way to go at that depth)???
Change the example depth to just below 10m /30 feet say to 13m, 40 feet... Would your answer change?
If one wants to switch between ambient light pictures and flash lit pictures on the same dive, would one not need a wet, removable red filter (off for flash, on for ambient) (at least with a camera like any Sony that does not have enough white balance correction "breath" for UW)?
If so, is then the standard (no filter thread) flat port that comes with the SeaFrogs A6xxx housing useless for that? Or how does one get a removable wet filter on that?
Options?
Expanding the thought:
If I were to play with a fisheye lens (Samyang f 8mm f2.8) under the 4"dome port (focus preset, aperture preset)... I also would have no option for a filter... But that sort of setup seems predestined more for available light than flash... Or do people flash that wide...?
If wanting to go available light are there any (thin) options for a filter between lens and camera housing (yes I could loose infinity focus (except stopped fown with fepth of field)... just wondering, is there such a thing as a thin e-mount to e-mount lens adapter that takes filters?
Other Options?
Also, I presently still stink at my photo editing-fu. That free Dive+ editors with the annoying unremovable (unless cropped) Dive + logo runs circles around me. Trying to understand if the following is or is not the case:
Ambient light:
So if the camera w/o filter cannot adjust a (manual) whitebalance correctly because of lack of adjustment range... but a filter helps with that... does that mean that if one was a better photo editor that one could tweak in a picture taken at some depth, (say 27m 90 feet-ish for the argument) in RAW, without filter to look like one taken with (red) filter? ... Or not really?
(and flash and close distance is not only the better, but the only way to go at that depth)???
Change the example depth to just below 10m /30 feet say to 13m, 40 feet... Would your answer change?