Support for Assembly Bill 634 needed if you want wrecks to dive.

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Chuck Tribolet

Contributor
Rest in Peace
Messages
2,910
Reaction score
110
Location
Morgan Hill, CA USA
California Ships to Reefs has been working with state
governmental agencies to lay the groundwork for approval of
artificial reef projects along the length of the California
coast. The main goals of these artificial reefs are the
creation of new habitats for ocean inhabitants, creating new
SCUBA diving and fishing sites resulting in greater
opportunities for ocean enthusiasts as well as economic
opportunities for businesses providing services to them, and
to provide a reasonable alternative to the long-term storage
or scrapping of decommissioned military or retired
commercial ships.

Assembly Bill AB634, authored by Assemblywoman Diane Harkey
(R-Dana Point) and sponsored by California Ships to Reefs,
provides a significant cornerstone to the approvals needed
from these agencies. AB634 specifically protects state and
local agencies from liability with respect to diving
incidents that may occur on artificial reefs placed in areas
controlled by state or local governments (State Lands
Commission is one example). Without passage of AB634, it
will be very difficult to go further with the other required
approvals needed to work on artificial reef projects.

It is critical that those wishing to see artificial reefing
succeed in California the way it has elsewhere in the
country (e.g., Florida) or internationally (e.g., British
Columbia) express support for this bill by contacting
Assemblywoman Harkey. Please feel free to use the letter
below to express your support. You can either print it and
send to Assemblywoman Harkey at the address below, or simply
copy and paste it into the “comments” section of her website
contact page at: http://arc.asm.ca.gov/member/73/?p=email.
Thank you for your help!

Honorable Diane Harkey
California State Assembly
State Capitol, Room 4177
Sacramento, CA 95814

RE: AB 634 - Support

Dear Assemblywoman Harkey,

As an avid ocean sport enthusiast and citizen concerned with
ocean conservancy, I would like to express my full support
for Assembly Bill AB634. This bill will enable the State
and local jurisdictions to participate in the placing of
these artificial reefs, beneficial to the economy and the
environment, free of the liability for injuries that might
occur to persons diving on these reefs. I believe that
artificial reefing can provide great benefits for ocean
conservancy, economic benefits for businesses providing
services to ocean enthusiasts, and viable alternatives for
disposal of decommissioned military or retired commercial
vessels.

I support AB634 and thank you for your efforts to ensure
that it passes through the State Legislature.

Sincerely,
your name here
 
Where are they thinking of placing the wrecks? It seems like there is enough structure along the coast to not need artificial reefs. It isn't like the lesser state of Florida where you can have miles of sand before getting to structure. But I will admit incomplete knowledge of the subject.
 
Wrecks attract a different set of diving enthusiasts, and are a draw to bring divers new to our coast here and increase opportunities for revenue generation. We on Catalina are interested in this and I have worked with Joel Geldin of CaStoR to get wrecks placed here.

With the current and upcoming efforts by the Marine Life Protect Act Initiative to established protected areas along our coast, wrecks also provide anglers with new fishing possibilities. I have supported CA StoR in part for this very reason, to provide some trade off for the habitat no longer fishable after the closures.

Support for AB634 is critical to this effort as Chuck has indicated.
 
Where are they thinking of placing the wrecks? It seems like there is enough structure along the coast to not need artificial reefs. It isn't like the lesser state of Florida where you can have miles of sand before getting to structure. But I will admit incomplete knowledge of the subject.

Mike, I couldn't find any info on prospective sites (though I'm pretty sure I read about it many months ago). However, I found this FAQ interesting, informative and entertaining: California Ships to Reefs, Inc. - Frequently Asked Questions
 
Me, too!

Good luck to us all and many thanks to those of you who have been working on this for so long.
 

Back
Top Bottom