H&E
Registered
First of all, I've been utterly impressed by the wealth of information present on these boards- it's been a pleasure wading through them.
Here is my situation. I am currently a veterinary student (read as relatively poor) that has been diving for ~21mos or so in the frosty but still lovely New England waters. As I'm becoming increasingly confident in my diving skills, buoancy control, etc I'm hoping to begin introducing photography into my diving. I am currently looking to purchase a digital camera that I can use above and below the water so I was planning to go with a decent camera and separate housing.
Because my funds are limited, I will not be able to purchase a strobe in the near future. It would probably not be an option for at least 2 years if not 3. With this in mind and the research I've done on the boards here, the 3 cameras that stood out and my concerns/thoughts regarding them are as follows:
Fuji F30- not fully manual, no RAW, but allegedly great in low lighting. I guess my question is whether the improved low light abilities would outweigh the lack of some of the more advanced features of the other cameras, given my lack of strobe. Perhaps it would be a good way to learn most of the basics before graduating to more advanced features once I'm through with my residency and start having an income. Other question is regarding the F30's batteries with traveling. Is it hard to deal with charging batteries at locations that don't use US voltage? For example, I am fortunate enough to be traveling to bonaire for a week before I start clinics this spring and I haven't been able to find specs as to whether the battery charger for the F30 can handle the different electrical parameters. Is the use of more readily available batteries for the other models a significant advantage (or even an advantage at all)?
Oly 350- more manual options, RAW, roughly same price range as the F30. This camera obviously seems to be more expandable than the F30, but is thinking about expansion 3+ years down the line even worth considering (will everything just be obsolete/nonsupported) or should I just go with the better low light camera (assuming the F30 is truely better in low light) for the time being and just assume that I'll probably be in the market again for a camera by the time I'd be looking for strobes.
Fuji E900- advanced features like the 350, a bit more expensive. I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts/knowledge regarding the use of this camera without a strobe as compared to the other cameras above. I guess I'm just assuming that it might be towards the other fuji in terms of low light abilities, but really wasn't able to verify this.
If anyone has any other thoughts or suggestions (ie did I miss the camera that'd be perfect for my situation?), I'd love to hear them as well. While I'm clearly a newbie, I'm a pretty patient guy and am not too concerned about losing interest in the hobby down the road. Also, if it makes a difference, I'll be using a mac for my photo managing (sorry, I haven't really done my homework yet with regards to compatibility--that is, if there are even any compatibility issues).
Thank you so much for any help and for putting up with the long drawn out post- I was just trying to be thorough.
-sam
Here is my situation. I am currently a veterinary student (read as relatively poor) that has been diving for ~21mos or so in the frosty but still lovely New England waters. As I'm becoming increasingly confident in my diving skills, buoancy control, etc I'm hoping to begin introducing photography into my diving. I am currently looking to purchase a digital camera that I can use above and below the water so I was planning to go with a decent camera and separate housing.
Because my funds are limited, I will not be able to purchase a strobe in the near future. It would probably not be an option for at least 2 years if not 3. With this in mind and the research I've done on the boards here, the 3 cameras that stood out and my concerns/thoughts regarding them are as follows:
Fuji F30- not fully manual, no RAW, but allegedly great in low lighting. I guess my question is whether the improved low light abilities would outweigh the lack of some of the more advanced features of the other cameras, given my lack of strobe. Perhaps it would be a good way to learn most of the basics before graduating to more advanced features once I'm through with my residency and start having an income. Other question is regarding the F30's batteries with traveling. Is it hard to deal with charging batteries at locations that don't use US voltage? For example, I am fortunate enough to be traveling to bonaire for a week before I start clinics this spring and I haven't been able to find specs as to whether the battery charger for the F30 can handle the different electrical parameters. Is the use of more readily available batteries for the other models a significant advantage (or even an advantage at all)?
Oly 350- more manual options, RAW, roughly same price range as the F30. This camera obviously seems to be more expandable than the F30, but is thinking about expansion 3+ years down the line even worth considering (will everything just be obsolete/nonsupported) or should I just go with the better low light camera (assuming the F30 is truely better in low light) for the time being and just assume that I'll probably be in the market again for a camera by the time I'd be looking for strobes.
Fuji E900- advanced features like the 350, a bit more expensive. I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts/knowledge regarding the use of this camera without a strobe as compared to the other cameras above. I guess I'm just assuming that it might be towards the other fuji in terms of low light abilities, but really wasn't able to verify this.
If anyone has any other thoughts or suggestions (ie did I miss the camera that'd be perfect for my situation?), I'd love to hear them as well. While I'm clearly a newbie, I'm a pretty patient guy and am not too concerned about losing interest in the hobby down the road. Also, if it makes a difference, I'll be using a mac for my photo managing (sorry, I haven't really done my homework yet with regards to compatibility--that is, if there are even any compatibility issues).
Thank you so much for any help and for putting up with the long drawn out post- I was just trying to be thorough.
-sam